reactive-firewall / multicast

The multicast package is a Python library that simplifies sending and receiving multicast network messages. It provides classes and tools for implementing multicast communication in Python applications, making it straightforward to work with multicast sockets.
Other
2 stars 0 forks source link

Exploring SARIF output #165

Open reactive-firewall opened 3 days ago

reactive-firewall commented 3 days ago

Should consider migrating to SARIF output for our custom checks. For example SARIF can be generated from python like so:

from sarif import *

# Create a new SARIF file
sarif_file = SarifFile()

# Add a run to the SARIF file
run = Run()
sarif_file.runs.append(run)

# Set the tool information for the run
tool = Tool()
tool.driver = ToolComponent("My Security Tool")
run.tool = tool

# Add an analysis target to the run
analysis_target = AnalysisTarget()
analysis_target.uri = Uri("example.c")
run.analysisTarget = analysis_target

# Add a result to the run
result = Result()
result.ruleId = "SECURITY-1001"
result.level = "error"
result.message = Message("Potential security vulnerability: SQL injection")

# Add a location to the result
location = Location()
location.physicalLocation = PhysicalLocation(
    artifactLocation=ArtifactLocation(uri=Uri("example.c"), index=1),
    region=Region(startLine=10, startColumn=15, endLine=10, endColumn=30)
)
result.locations.append(location)

run.results.append(result)

# Serialize the SARIF file to JSON
sarif_json = sarif_file.to_json()

# Write the SARIF JSON to a file
with open("output.sarif", "w") as f:
    f.write(sarif_json)
reactive-firewall commented 2 days ago

@coderabbitai, Please explore how I could use the output SARIF file to upload the results to github's codeQL dashboard. Assume the SARIF file is already generated and named "output.sarif" for this.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 days ago

[!TIP] For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@reactive-firewall, to upload your generated SARIF file output.sarif to GitHub's CodeQL dashboard, you can utilize a GitHub Actions workflow. Here's how you can set this up:

  1. Create a new workflow file in your repository under .github/workflows/upload-sarif.yml.

  2. Add the following content to the workflow file:

    name: Upload SARIF to Code Scanning
    
    on:
     push:
       branches: [main]
     workflow_dispatch:
    
    jobs:
     upload-sarif:
       runs-on: ubuntu-latest
       steps:
         - name: Checkout repository
           uses: actions/checkout@v3
    
         - name: Upload SARIF file to Code Scanning
           uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v2
           with:
             sarif_file: output.sarif

    Explanation:

    • Triggers (on): The workflow triggers on pushes to the main branch and can also be manually triggered via the "Run workflow" button in the Actions tab (workflow_dispatch).

    • Jobs:

      • upload-sarif: Defines the job that runs on ubuntu-latest.
      • Checkout the code: Uses actions/checkout@v3 to ensure the SARIF file is accessible.
      • Upload SARIF: Utilizes github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v2 to upload the output.sarif file to the Code Scanning dashboard.
  3. Ensure the SARIF file is available during the workflow execution. If output.sarif is generated by your code, you might need to include the step that creates it before the upload step.

    - name: Generate SARIF file
     run: |
       python3 your_script_that_generates_sarif.py
  4. Commit and push the workflow file to your repository.

Once this workflow runs, GitHub will process the SARIF file, and any findings will appear in the "Security" tab under "Code scanning alerts."

Note: If you have multiple SARIF files or need to upload from a different location, you can adjust the sarif_file path accordingly or use wildcards like **/*.sarif.

Let me know if you need further assistance or have any questions!


🧠 Learnings used ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T00:41:41.731Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T03:22:28.902Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution". ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution". ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T01:03:10.574Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation. ```
reactive-firewall commented 1 day ago

@coderabbitai consider the following

import argparse
import subprocess
import json
import os

class ShellCheckCLI:
    def __init__(self, shell, severity, files):
        self.shell = shell
        self.severity = severity
        self.files = files

    def run_shellcheck(self):
        """Run shellcheck with the specified arguments and return the JSON output."""
        command = ['shellcheck', f'--shell={self.shell}', f'--severity={self.severity}', '--format=json1'] + self.files
        try:
            result = subprocess.run(command, capture_output=True, text=True, check=True)
            return json.loads(result.stdout)
        except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
            print(f"Error running shellcheck: {e}")
            return []

    def convert_to_sarif(self, shellcheck_results):
        """Convert shellcheck JSON results to SARIF format."""
        sarif_results = {
            "version": "2.1.0",
            "runs": [{
                "tool": {
                    "driver": {
                        "name": "ShellCheck",
                        "version": "0.7.2",  # Update this to the version you are using
                        "informationUri": "https://www.shellcheck.net/",
                        "rules": []
                    }
                },
                "results": []
            }]
        }

        # Create SARIF rules based on shellcheck codes
        rule_map = {}
        for entry in shellcheck_results:
            code = entry['code']
            if code not in rule_map:
                rule_map[code] = {
                    "id": code,
                    "shortDescription": {
                        "text": entry['message']
                    }
                }
                sarif_results['runs'][0]['tool']['driver']['rules'].append(rule_map[code])

            # Create SARIF result
            result = {
                "ruleId": code,
                "message": {
                    "text": entry['message']
                },
                "locations": [{
                    "physicalLocation": {
                        "artifactLocation": {
                            "uri": entry['file']
                        },
                        "region": {
                            "startLine": entry['line'],
                            "startColumn": entry['column']
                        }
                    }
                }]
            }
            sarif_results['runs'][0]['results'].append(result)

        return sarif_results

    def write_sarif(self, sarif_results):
        """Write the SARIF results to a file."""
        with open("shellcheck.sarif", "w") as sarif_file:
            json.dump(sarif_results, sarif_file, indent=2)

def main():
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Run ShellCheck and output results in SARIF format.")
    parser.add_argument('--shell', choices=['bash', 'sh', 'dash', 'ksh', 'busybox'], default='bash', help='Specify the shell type.')
    parser.add_argument('--severity', choices=['error', 'warning', 'info', 'style'], default='style', help='Specify the severity level.')
    parser.add_argument('FILES', nargs='+', help='One or more files or glob patterns to check.')

    args = parser.parse_args()

    cli_tool = ShellCheckCLI(args.shell, args.severity, args.FILES)
    shellcheck_results = cli_tool.run_shellcheck()
    sarif_results = cli_tool.convert_to_sarif(shellcheck_results)
    cli_tool.write_sarif(sarif_results)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()
coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 day ago

[!TIP] For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@reactive-firewall,

To ensure that your code generates a valid SARIF file compatible with GitHub's code scanning, you can consider the following improvements:

  1. Utilize a SARIF Library:

    Instead of manually constructing the SARIF JSON structure, you can leverage existing SARIF libraries like sarif-om to ensure compliance with the SARIF specifications and reduce potential errors.

    Here's how you can modify your code to properly use the sarif-om module:

    import argparse
    import subprocess
    import json
    import sarif_om as sarif
    
    class ShellCheckCLI:
       def __init__(self, shell, severity, files):
           self.shell = shell
           self.severity = severity
           self.files = files
    
       def run_shellcheck(self):
           """Run shellcheck with the specified arguments and return the JSON output."""
           command = ['shellcheck', f'--shell={self.shell}', f'--severity={self.severity}', '--format=json1'] + self.files
           try:
               result = subprocess.run(command, capture_output=True, text=True, check=True)
               return json.loads(result.stdout)
           except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
               print(f"Error running shellcheck: {e}")
               return []
    
       def convert_to_sarif(self, shellcheck_results):
           """Convert shellcheck JSON results to SARIF format using sarif-om."""
           # Initialize the SARIF log
           sarif_log = sarif.SarifLog(
               version="2.1.0",
               runs=[
                   sarif.Run(
                       tool=sarif.Tool(
                           driver=sarif.ToolComponent(
                               name="ShellCheck",
                               version="0.7.2",  # Update to your ShellCheck version
                               informationUri="https://www.shellcheck.net/",
                               rules=[]
                           )
                       ),
                       results=[]
                   )
               ]
           )
    
           run = sarif_log.runs[0]
           driver = run.tool.driver
    
           # Map to track unique rules
           rule_ids = {}
    
           for entry in shellcheck_results:
               code = f"SC{entry['code']}"  # Prefix with 'SC' to match ShellCheck codes
               # Add unique rules to the driver
               if code not in rule_ids:
                   rule = sarif.ReportingDescriptor(
                       id=code,
                       name=code,
                       shortDescription=sarif.MultiformatMessageString(
                           text=entry.get('message', '')
                       ),
                       helpUri=f"https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/{code}"
                   )
                   driver.rules.append(rule)
                   rule_ids[code] = rule
    
               # Create the result object
               result = sarif.Result(
                   ruleId=code,
                   message=sarif.Message(
                       text=entry.get('message', '')
                   ),
                   locations=[
                       sarif.Location(
                           physicalLocation=sarif.PhysicalLocation(
                               artifactLocation=sarif.ArtifactLocation(
                                   uri=entry.get('file', '')
                               ),
                               region=sarif.Region(
                                   startLine=entry.get('line', 0),
                                   startColumn=entry.get('column', 0)
                               )
                           )
                       )
                   )
               )
    
               run.results.append(result)
    
           return sarif_log
    
       def write_sarif(self, sarif_log):
           """Write the SARIF log to a file."""
           with open("shellcheck.sarif", "w") as sarif_file:
               json.dump(sarif_log.to_dict(), sarif_file, indent=2)
    
    def main():
       parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Run ShellCheck and output results in SARIF format.")
       parser.add_argument('--shell', choices=['bash', 'sh', 'dash', 'ksh', 'busybox'], default='bash', help='Specify the shell type.')
       parser.add_argument('--severity', choices=['error', 'warning', 'info', 'style'], default='style', help='Specify the severity level.')
       parser.add_argument('FILES', nargs='+', help='One or more files or glob patterns to check.')
    
       args = parser.parse_args()
    
       cli_tool = ShellCheckCLI(args.shell, args.severity, args.FILES)
       shellcheck_results = cli_tool.run_shellcheck()
       sarif_log = cli_tool.convert_to_sarif(shellcheck_results)
       cli_tool.write_sarif(sarif_log)
    
    if __name__ == "__main__":
       main()

    Key Improvements:

    • Use of sarif_om Library: This ensures that the SARIF file adheres strictly to the SARIF 2.1.0 specification, which GitHub requires.
    • Automatic Schema Compliance: By using the library's classes and methods, you minimize the risk of structural errors in the SARIF file.
    • Dynamic Rule Handling: The code creates rule entries dynamically, ensuring that all unique ShellCheck codes are properly documented.
  2. Enhance Code Quality:

    • Error Handling:
      • Provide more informative error messages.
      • Handle potential exceptions when accessing dictionary keys using entry.get('key', default) to avoid KeyError.
    • Logging:
      • Consider integrating the logging module for debug output instead of printing directly to stdout.
    • Code Organization:
      • Break down larger methods into smaller, testable units.
      • Add type hints for better code readability and maintainability.
    • Documentation:
      • Expand docstrings to include parameter descriptions and return types.
      • Provide usage examples in the docstrings or a README file.
  3. Ensure Correct File Paths:

    • Relative Paths: Ensure that the uri in artifactLocation is relative to the repository root. This is crucial for GitHub to correctly map the results to the source files.
    • URI Encoding: Use proper URI encoding for file paths to handle spaces and special characters.
  4. Make Output File Configurable:

    • Allow users to specify the output SARIF file name via a command-line argument.

      parser.add_argument('--output', default='shellcheck.sarif', help='Specify the output SARIF file name.')

      Update the write_sarif method to use args.output.

  5. Add a Requirements File:

    • Include a requirements.txt with the necessary dependencies:

      sarif-om>=1.0.4
  6. Example Usage in CI/CD:

    • Provide guidance on integrating this script into a CI workflow, ensuring that the SARIF file is generated and uploaded to GitHub's code scanning.

    • GitHub Actions Workflow Example:

      name: ShellCheck SARIF Analysis
      
      on:
      push:
       branches: [main]
      pull_request:
       branches: [main]
      workflow_dispatch:
      
      jobs:
      shellcheck-sarif:
       runs-on: ubuntu-latest
       steps:
         - name: Checkout repository
           uses: actions/checkout@v3
      
         - name: Set up Python
           uses: actions/setup-python@v4
           with:
             python-version: '3.x'
      
         - name: Install dependencies
           run: |
             pip install -r requirements.txt
      
         - name: Run ShellCheck and Generate SARIF
           run: |
             python your_script.py --shell=bash --severity=style scripts/*.sh --output shellcheck.sarif
      
         - name: Upload SARIF file to GitHub Code Scanning
           uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v2
           with:
             sarif_file: shellcheck.sarif

Additional Considerations:

By incorporating these improvements, your script will generate a valid SARIF file suitable for GitHub's code scanning dashboard, leveraging the robustness of an existing SARIF library and enhancing overall code quality.

Let me know if you have any questions or need further assistance!


🧠 Learnings used ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T00:41:41.731Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T03:22:28.902Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution". ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution". ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T01:03:10.574Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation. ```
coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 day ago

[!TIP] For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@reactive-firewall,

I've reviewed your code for generating a SARIF file from ShellCheck results. To ensure the resulting SARIF file is valid for use with GitHub, here are some suggestions to improve the code:


1. Use an Official SARIF Library

Instead of manually constructing the SARIF JSON structure, consider using an official SARIF library like sarif-om. This ensures compliance with the SARIF schema and reduces the risk of formatting errors.

Install the sarif-om library:

pip install sarif-om

Update your code to utilize sarif-om:

import argparse
import subprocess
import json
import os
from sarif_om import SarifLog, Run, Tool, ToolComponent, ReportingDescriptor, Result, Message, PhysicalLocation, ArtifactLocation, Region

class ShellCheckCLI:
    def __init__(self, shell, severity, files):
        self.shell = shell
        self.severity = severity
        self.files = files

    def run_shellcheck(self):
        """Run ShellCheck with the specified arguments and return the JSON output."""
        command = ['shellcheck', f'--shell={self.shell}', f'--severity={self.severity}', '--format=json1'] + self.files
        try:
            result = subprocess.run(command, capture_output=True, text=True, check=True)
            return json.loads(result.stdout)
        except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
            print(f"Error running ShellCheck: {e.stderr}")
            return []
        except FileNotFoundError:
            print("ShellCheck is not installed or not found in PATH.")
            return []

    def convert_to_sarif(self, shellcheck_results):
        """Convert ShellCheck JSON results to SARIF format using sarif-om."""
        # Initialize the SARIF log
        sarif_log = SarifLog(
            version="2.1.0",
            runs=[]
        )

        # Create the tool component
        tool = Tool(
            driver=ToolComponent(
                name="ShellCheck",
                version="0.7.2",  # Update to your ShellCheck version
                informationUri="https://www.shellcheck.net/",
                rules=[]
            )
        )

        # Map to store rules
        rule_map = {}

        # Create results list
        results = []

        for entry in shellcheck_results:
            code = str(entry['code'])
            if code not in rule_map:
                # Define a new rule
                rule = ReportingDescriptor(
                    id=code,
                    shortDescription=Message(text=entry.get('message', '')),
                    helpUri=f"https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck/wiki/SC{code}"
                )
                rule_map[code] = rule
                tool.driver.rules.append(rule)

            # Define the result
            result = Result(
                ruleId=code,
                message=Message(text=entry.get('message', '')),
                locations=[
                    {
                        "physicalLocation": PhysicalLocation(
                            artifactLocation=ArtifactLocation(
                                uri=os.path.relpath(entry['file'])
                            ),
                            region=Region(
                                startLine=entry['line'],
                                startColumn=entry['column']
                            )
                        )
                    }
                ]
            )
            results.append(result)

        # Assemble the run
        run = Run(
            tool=tool,
            results=results
        )

        sarif_log.runs.append(run)
        return sarif_log

    def write_sarif(self, sarif_log):
        """Write the SARIF log to a file."""
        with open("shellcheck.sarif", "w") as sarif_file:
            json.dump(sarif_log.to_dict(), sarif_file, indent=2)

def main():
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Run ShellCheck and output results in SARIF format.")
    parser.add_argument('--shell', choices=['bash', 'sh', 'dash', 'ksh', 'busybox'], default='bash', help='Specify the shell type.')
    parser.add_argument('--severity', choices=['error', 'warning', 'info', 'style'], default='style', help='Specify the severity level.')
    parser.add_argument('FILES', nargs='+', help='One or more files or glob patterns to check.')

    args = parser.parse_args()

    cli_tool = ShellCheckCLI(args.shell, args.severity, args.FILES)
    shellcheck_results = cli_tool.run_shellcheck()
    sarif_log = cli_tool.convert_to_sarif(shellcheck_results)
    cli_tool.write_sarif(sarif_log)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Benefits of using sarif-om:


2. Additional Improvements


3. Example with Enhanced Error Handling and Logging

import argparse
import subprocess
import json
import os
import logging
from sarif_om import SarifLog, Run, Tool, ToolComponent, ReportingDescriptor, Result, Message, PhysicalLocation, ArtifactLocation, Region

logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)

class ShellCheckCLI:
    def __init__(self, shell: str, severity: str, files: list):
        self.shell = shell
        self.severity = severity
        self.files = files

    def run_shellcheck(self) -> list:
        """Run ShellCheck with the specified arguments and return the JSON output."""
        command = ['shellcheck', f'--shell={self.shell}', f'--severity={self.severity}', '--format=json1'] + self.files
        try:
            logging.info(f"Running command: {' '.join(command)}")
            result = subprocess.run(command, capture_output=True, text=True, check=True)
            return json.loads(result.stdout)
        except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
            logging.error(f"ShellCheck error: {e.stderr}")
            return []
        except FileNotFoundError:
            logging.error("ShellCheck is not installed or not found in PATH.")
            return []

    # ... (rest of the code remains the same)

4. Verify SARIF File with GitHub


5. Ensure Relative Paths in artifactLocation


Let me know if you have any questions or need further assistance!


🧠 Learnings used ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T00:41:41.731Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T03:22:28.902Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution". ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution". ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T01:03:10.574Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation. ```
reactive-firewall commented 1 day ago

@coderabbitai, please explain more about your suggestion: " Testing: Before integrating into your CI/CD pipeline, manually upload the generated shellcheck.sarif file to your repository's code scanning alerts to verify compatibility. "

Where is the documentation to manually upload sarifs to github and summarize what it says.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 day ago

[!TIP] For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@reactive-firewall,

Certainly! I'd be happy to explain how to manually upload a SARIF file to GitHub and provide a summary of the relevant documentation.


Manually Uploading a SARIF File to GitHub's Code Scanning

Manually uploading your shellcheck.sarif file allows you to test and verify that the SARIF output from your tool is correctly interpreted by GitHub before integrating it into your CI/CD pipeline.

Steps to Manually Upload a SARIF File:

  1. Navigate to Your Repository:

    • Go to your GitHub repository where you want to upload the SARIF file.
  2. Access the Security Tab:

    • Click on the "Security" tab located below your repository name.
  3. Open Code Scanning Alerts:

    • In the left sidebar, select "Code scanning alerts".
    • If you haven't set up code scanning before, you might see a prompt to set it up. You can proceed to upload manually without setting up a scanning tool.
  4. Upload the SARIF File:

    • Click on the "Upload SARIF file" button on the right side of the page.
    • In the dialog that appears, click "Choose your SARIF file" and select your shellcheck.sarif file from your local machine.
    • Optionally, you can provide a Commit SHA to associate the alerts with a specific commit (if applicable).
    • Click "Upload" to submit the file.
  5. Review the Results:

    • After uploading, GitHub will process the SARIF file.
    • Once processing is complete, any findings or alerts will be displayed in the Code scanning alerts page.
    • You can click on individual alerts to view detailed information, including the file, line number, and the specific issue detected.

Summary of GitHub Documentation on Uploading SARIF Files:

Documentation Reference: Uploading a SARIF file to GitHub

Next Steps:

Additional Tips:


Let me know if you need any more information or assistance with uploading your SARIF file!


🧠 Learnings used ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T00:41:41.731Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T03:22:28.902Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution". ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution". ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T01:03:10.574Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation. ```
coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 day ago

[!TIP] For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@reactive-firewall,

Certainly! I'd be happy to provide more details about manually uploading SARIF files to GitHub and summarize the relevant documentation.


Manually Uploading SARIF Files to GitHub's Code Scanning Alerts

Manually uploading your shellcheck.sarif file to GitHub allows you to verify that the SARIF file is correctly formatted and that GitHub's code scanning features process it as expected before integrating it into your automated CI/CD pipeline.

Steps to Manually Upload a SARIF File:

  1. Navigate to Your Repository's Security Tab:

    • Go to your GitHub repository page.
    • Click on the "Security" tab located beneath your repository name.
  2. Access Code Scanning Alerts:

    • In the left sidebar under the Security tab, click on "Code scanning alerts".
    • If this is your first time, you might see a prompt to set up code scanning.
  3. Upload the SARIF File:

    • On the Code scanning alerts page, look for the "Upload SARIF file" button and click it.
      • Note: If you don't see this button, ensure you have the necessary permissions (you need to be a repository owner or have write access).
    • In the upload dialog, click "Choose your SARIF file" and select the shellcheck.sarif file from your local machine.
  4. Confirm the Upload:

    • After selecting the file, click the "Upload" button.
    • GitHub will begin processing the SARIF file. This may take a few moments depending on the file size and the number of results.
  5. View the Results:

    • Once processed, any code scanning alerts generated from the SARIF file will appear in the Code scanning alerts section.
    • You can click on individual alerts to see detailed information about each issue.

Documentation Reference:

You can find the official GitHub documentation for this process here:

Summary of the Documentation:


Why This is Helpful:


Let me know if you have any further questions or need additional assistance!


🧠 Learnings used ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T00:41:41.731Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T03:22:28.902Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution". ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution". ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T01:03:10.574Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation. ```