Track testing and rollout of apt-get package version pinning

[coderabbitai[bot]]

Per the request from @reactive-firewall here, we need to track the testing and roll-out of apt-get packages being pinned to versions on a separate development branch before merging to master.

Pull request: https://github.com/reactive-firewall/multicast/pull/184

Requested by: @reactive-firewall

[reactive-firewall]

@coderabbitai, how do we implement this apt-get package version pinning? Walk me through the specific cases in our codebase?

[coderabbitai[bot]]

[!TIP] For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@reactive-firewall, I searched the codebase for any instances of apt-get commands but didn't find any occurrences. It's possible that package installations are handled differently in our project.

To implement apt-get package version pinning, you can specify the exact version of the package in your install commands. For example:

sudo apt-get install package=version

This ensures that a specific package version is installed, promoting consistency across different environments.

Since we need to track the testing and rollout on a separate development branch before merging to master, we can create a new branch (e.g., feature/apt-version-pinning) to implement these changes. This allows us to thoroughly test the version pinning without affecting the main codebase.

If you could point me to the specific scripts or files where apt-get is used, I'd be happy to walk you through implementing version pinning in those cases. This way, we can ensure the changes are applied accurately where needed.

Let me know if you have any additional details or if there's anything else I can assist with.

🔗 Analysis chain

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ``` #!/bin/bash # Find all occurrences of 'apt-get' commands in the codebase with line numbers and context. rg 'apt-get' -n -A 2 ``` Length of output: 20

---

🧠 Learnings used

``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-11-21T02:05:08.096Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers scripts to include explicit data processing steps that produce the expected output, ensuring accurate and useful results. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:50.461Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-11-21T02:05:08.096Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to specify the full raw URL when fetching files from gists to ensure correct retrieval of content, particularly when the file is in markdown format. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:55.563Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184 File: LICENSE.md:36-43 Timestamp: 2024-11-14T07:03:35.207Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers that I verify URLs before suggesting changes, and avoid raising hypothetical issues without verification. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184 File: tests/check_pip:259-265 Timestamp: 2024-11-15T19:32:16.878Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers that code changes adhere to SOLID design principles, specifically avoiding unnecessary complexity (AHA principle), maintaining the Single Responsibility Principle, and ensuring complex work is done on separate development branches (Open/Closed Principle). ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:55.563Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution". ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP (Convention Enhancement Proposal) documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References. ``` --- ``` Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:55.563Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation. ```