These should be resolvable by the differing types:
.. dn:field:: Foo
.. dn:property:: Foo
This is not a major issue, as the name conflict is likely a syntax error in .NET? However, there could be cases where the intended behavior of the rST is to have both separately addressable.
These should be resolvable by the differing types:
This is not a major issue, as the name conflict is likely a syntax error in .NET? However, there could be cases where the intended behavior of the rST is to have both separately addressable.