Closed Frozenlock closed 9 years ago
Sounds like the core.cljx
could probably be removed entirely since it doesn't do anything useful.
Or perhaps just name it core2.cljx
or something?
It's nice to have the .cljx file, because you immediately know where it's supposed to be without looking at your project.clj
.
That's a good point, so possibly util.cljx
or something then. :)
Ok renamed and pushed out a new template to clojars, I notice that I have to also run lein cljx
explicitly I haven't looked hard to see if there's a way around that though.
On an unrelated note, are you still up for adding historian to the org? :)
Great, I'll close this issue then.
For Historian: Am I, but I haven't received many criticisms (good or bad) on the issue.
ah I didn't notice the issue, I see Sean commented already :)
I scratched my head for quite a while trying to understand why the compiled js wasn't the one in
core.clj
. Turns out there's a defaultcore.cljx
that's overwriting the file when generating the cljs version.