Closed smkuhlani closed 4 months ago
Thanks.
Please do not move scripts around like this because then we cannot see what changes were made. You can just leave them in pending
The "treatment variables" are described as "site x management x soil x season"; but we do not add location and season (time and space; because they are always treatments in aggregated data). So that leaves management and soil, which became landscape_position;land_prep_method;OM_amount
. OM_used
is redundant and (less informative than) with OM_amount
. It is, however, not clear to what extent these actually are (experimental) "treatments". There are 700 to 1150 fields per year. This looks more like a survey (perhaps with a control group). There is no metadata, unfortunately.
Revised the script ‘doi:10.18167/DVN1/2EHEQT.R’, in pending to the main folder /scripts/conservation_agriculture. 1-revised PK ammounts, based on literature search. Extrapolated fertilizer PK proportions. Assessment shows N, as 11%. Most common rice fertilizer with 11% N in Madagascar is 11:22:16 (NPK). https://agritrop.cirad.fr/539499/1/document_539499.pdf