realethantran / fastpages_EthanT

MIT License
0 stars 2 forks source link

Performance Task Scoring #2 - Ethan Tran #23

Open realethantran opened 1 year ago

realethantran commented 1 year ago

Submission 1

Video

Row My Grade College Board's Grade Comments
Row 1: Program Purpose and Function (0-1 points) 1/1 (total) 0/1 (total) - [x] input - [x] program functionality - [x] output - The video properly displays the user input and output, along with a functioning program.
Row 2: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 3: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 4: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 5: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 6: No video portion N/A N/A N/A

Written Response

Row My Grade College Board's Grade Comments
Row 1: Program Purpose and Function (0-1 points) 1/1 (total) 0/1 (total) - [x] describes the overall purpose of the program. - [x] describes what functionality of the program is demonstrated in the video. - [x] describes the input and output of the program demonstrated in the video.
Row 2: Data Abstraction (0-1 points) 0/1 01 - [ ] includes two program code segments: - one that shows how data has been stored in this list (or other collection type). - one that shows the data in this same list being used as part of fulfilling the program’s purpose. - [ ] identifies the name of the variable representing the list being used in this response. - [ ] describes what the data contained in this list is representing in the program.
Row 3: Managing Complexity (0-1 points) 0/1 0/1 - [ ] includes a program code segment that shows a list Complexity being used to manage complexity in the program. - [ ] explains how the named, selected list manages complexity in the program code by explaining why the program code could not be written, or how it would be written differently, without using this list.
Row 4: Procedural Abstraction (0-1 points) 0/1 0/1 - [ ] includes two program code segments: - one showing a student-developed procedure includes two program code segments: with at least one parameter that has an effect on the functionality of the procedure. - one showing where the student-developed procedure is being called - [ ] describes what the identified procedure does and how it contributes to the overall functionality of the program.
Row 5: Algorithm Implentation (0-1 points) 0/1 0/1 - [x] includes a program code segment of a student-developed algorithm that includes - sequencing - selection - iteration - [x] explains in detailed steps how the identified algorithm works in enough detail that someone else could recreate it.
Row 6: Testing (0-1 points) 1/1 1/1 - [x] describes two calls to the selected procedure identified in written response 3c. Each call must pass a different argument(s) that causes a different segment of code in the algorithm to execute. - [x] describes the condition(s) being tested by each call to the procedure. - [x] identifies the result of each call

My Score: 2/6

College Board's Score: 1/6

Reflection

Discrepancies: The score that I gave was 2/6, while College Board graded this submission 1/6. I had believed that the submission properly met all of the requirements for row 1, but College Board disagreed.

What my program will need: My program will need to feature a detailed description of the functionality. Furthermore, I must also make sure that my code runs as intended before submitting my work.

Why the submission may have failed: The submission did not completely describe the functionality nor show the correct output of the program.

realethantran commented 1 year ago

Submission 2

Video

Row My Grade College Board's Grade Comments
Row 1: Program Purpose and Function (0-1 points) 1/1 (total) 0/1 (total) - [x] input - [x] program functionality - [x] output - The video properly displays the user input and output, along with a functioning program.
Row 2: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 3: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 4: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 5: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 6: No video portion N/A N/A N/A

Written Response

Row My Grade College Board's Grade Comments
Row 1: Program Purpose and Function (0-1 points) 1/1 (total) 0/1 (total) - [x] describes the overall purpose of the program. - [x] describes what functionality of the program is demonstrated in the video. - [x] describes the input and output of the program demonstrated in the video.
Row 2: Data Abstraction (0-1 points) 1/1 1/1 - [x] includes two program code segments: - one that shows how data has been stored in this list (or other collection type). - one that shows the data in this same list being used as part of fulfilling the program’s purpose. - [x] identifies the name of the variable representing the list being used in this response. - [x] describes what the data contained in this list is representing in the program.
Row 3: Managing Complexity (0-1 points) 0/1 0/1 - [x] includes a program code segment that shows a list Complexity being used to manage complexity in the program. - [x] explains how the named, selected list manages complexity in the program code by explaining why the program code could not be written, or how it would be written differently, without using this list.
Row 4: Procedural Abstraction (0-1 points) 1/1 1/1 - [x] includes two program code segments: - one showing a student-developed procedure includes two program code segments: with at least one parameter that has an effect on the functionality of the procedure. - one showing where the student-developed procedure is being called - [x] describes what the identified procedure does and how it contributes to the overall functionality of the program.
Row 5: Algorithm Implentation (0-1 points) 1/1 1/1 - [x] includes a program code segment of a student-developed algorithm that includes - sequencing - selection - iteration - [x] explains in detailed steps how the identified algorithm works in enough detail that someone else could recreate it.
Row 6: Testing (0-1 points) 1/1 1/1 - [x] describes two calls to the selected procedure identified in written response 3c. Each call must pass a different argument(s) that causes a different segment of code in the algorithm to execute. - [x] describes the condition(s) being tested by each call to the procedure. - [x] identifies the result of each call

My Score: 6/6

College Board's Score: 6/6

Reflection

Discrepancies: There are no discrepancies between my score and that of College Board for this submission. We both gave this submission a 6/6.

What my program will need: I will need to make my program and writing the best work that I can possibly put out - making sure to meet each criteria prior to submission. This will help to ensure that my submission receives full points.

Why the submission got full credit: This submission got full credit due to the fact that it excellently passes each of the criteria given by College Board, making no mistakes. The writing portion is very clear and properly explains each detail that is on the College Board rubric.

realethantran commented 1 year ago

Submission 3

Video

Row My Grade College Board's Grade Comments
Row 1: Program Purpose and Function (0-1 points) 1/1 (total) 0/1 (total) - [x] input - [x] program functionality - [x] output - The video properly displays the user input and output, along with a functioning program.
Row 2: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 3: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 4: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 5: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 6: No video portion N/A N/A N/A

Written Response

Row My Grade College Board's Grade Comments
Row 1: Program Purpose and Function (0-1 points) 1/1 (total) 0/1 (total) - [x] describes the overall purpose of the program. - [x] describes what functionality of the program is demonstrated in the video. - [x] describes the input and output of the program demonstrated in the video.
Row 2: Data Abstraction (0-1 points) 1/1 1/1 - [x] includes two program code segments: - one that shows how data has been stored in this list (or other collection type). - one that shows the data in this same list being used as part of fulfilling the program’s purpose. - [x] identifies the name of the variable representing the list being used in this response. - [x] describes what the data contained in this list is representing in the program.
Row 3: Managing Complexity (0-1 points) 1/1 1/1 - [x] includes a program code segment that shows a list Complexity being used to manage complexity in the program. - [x] explains how the named, selected list manages complexity in the program code by explaining why the program code could not be written, or how it would be written differently, without using this list.
Row 4: Procedural Abstraction (0-1 points) 1/1 1/1 - [x] includes two program code segments: - one showing a student-developed procedure includes two program code segments: with at least one parameter that has an effect on the functionality of the procedure. - one showing where the student-developed procedure is being called - [x] describes what the identified procedure does and how it contributes to the overall functionality of the program.
Row 5: Algorithm Implentation (0-1 points) 1/1 1/1 - [x] includes a program code segment of a student-developed algorithm that includes - sequencing - selection - iteration - [x] explains in detailed steps how the identified algorithm works in enough detail that someone else could recreate it.
Row 6: Testing (0-1 points) 1/1 1/1 - [x] describes two calls to the selected procedure identified in written response 3c. Each call must pass a different argument(s) that causes a different segment of code in the algorithm to execute. - [x] describes the condition(s) being tested by each call to the procedure. - [x] identifies the result of each call

My Score: 6/6

College Board's Score: 5/6

Reflection

Discrepancies: While I gave this submission full points, College Board graded it a 5/6. This is due to a difference between our scores for row 1, in which I gave the submission full credit - College Board however, did not.

What my program will need: My submission will need to explain both the purpose and function of the program without missing any details no matter how significant or small.

Why the submission may have failed: This submission most likely failed due to a failure to properly explain the purpose of the program completely.

realethantran commented 1 year ago

Submission 4

Video

Row My Grade College Board's Grade Comments
Row 1: Program Purpose and Function (0-1 points) 1/1 (total) 1/1 (total) - [x] input - [x] program functionality - [x] output - The video properly displays the user input and output, along with a functioning program.
Row 2: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 3: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 4: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 5: No video portion N/A N/A N/A
Row 6: No video portion N/A N/A N/A

Written Response

Row My Grade College Board's Grade Comments
Row 1: Program Purpose and Function (0-1 points) 1/1 (total) 1/1 (total) - [x] describes the overall purpose of the program. - [x] describes what functionality of the program is demonstrated in the video. - [x] describes the input and output of the program demonstrated in the video.
Row 2: Data Abstraction (0-1 points) 0/1 0/1 - [x] includes two program code segments: - one that shows how data has been stored in this list (or other collection type). - one that shows the data in this same list being used as part of fulfilling the program’s purpose. - [x] identifies the name of the variable representing the list being used in this response. - [ ] describes what the data contained in this list is representing in the program.
Row 3: Managing Complexity (0-1 points) 0/1 0/1 - [ ] includes a program code segment that shows a list Complexity being used to manage complexity in the program. - [x] explains how the named, selected list manages complexity in the program code by explaining why the program code could not be written, or how it would be written differently, without using this list.
Row 4: Procedural Abstraction (0-1 points) 1/1 1/1 - [x] includes two program code segments: - one showing a student-developed procedure includes two program code segments: with at least one parameter that has an effect on the functionality of the procedure. - one showing where the student-developed procedure is being called - [x] describes what the identified procedure does and how it contributes to the overall functionality of the program.
Row 5: Algorithm Implentation (0-1 points) 1/1 1/1 - [x] includes a program code segment of a student-developed algorithm that includes - sequencing - selection - iteration - [x] explains in detailed steps how the identified algorithm works in enough detail that someone else could recreate it.
Row 6: Testing (0-1 points) 1/1 0/1 - [x] describes two calls to the selected procedure identified in written response 3c. Each call must pass a different argument(s) that causes a different segment of code in the algorithm to execute. - [x] describes the condition(s) being tested by each call to the procedure. - [x] identifies the result of each call

My Score: 4/6

College Board's Score: 3/6

Reflection

Discrepancies: While College Board gave this submission a score of 3/6, I graded it a 4/6. This is due to a difference in our score for row 6.

What my program will need: My program will need to completely describe the complexity and data contained in the list(s) that I decide to make.

Why the submission may have failed: This submission failed to utilize the data stored in the list that is a part the code. To add, the list does not manage any sort of complexity, the written portion also fails to both recognize and explain the use of the list to manage complexity. Lastly, this submission does not feature any testing points that use any sort of arguments or separate functions. With these failures meet the given criteria, the submission earned a total score of 3/6 by College Board.