SwiftLintBot
commented
3 months ago | 17 Messages | |
|---|---|
| :book: | Linting Aerial with this PR took 1.23s vs 1.23s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Alamofire with this PR took 1.78s vs 1.79s on main (0% faster) |
| :book: | Linting Brave with this PR took 10.41s vs 10.37s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting DuckDuckGo with this PR took 5.64s vs 5.68s on main (0% faster) |
| :book: | Linting Firefox with this PR took 13.06s vs 13.05s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Kickstarter with this PR took 12.6s vs 12.6s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Moya with this PR took 0.68s vs 0.68s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting NetNewsWire with this PR took 3.86s vs 3.88s on main (0% faster) |
| :book: | Linting Nimble with this PR took 1.01s vs 1.02s on main (0% faster) |
| :book: | Linting PocketCasts with this PR took 10.19s vs 10.25s on main (0% faster) |
| :book: | Linting Quick with this PR took 0.45s vs 0.45s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Realm with this PR took 6.34s vs 6.33s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Sourcery with this PR took 3.12s vs 3.15s on main (0% faster) |
| :book: | Linting Swift with this PR took 6.3s vs 6.33s on main (0% faster) |
| :book: | Linting VLC with this PR took 1.67s vs 1.67s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Wire with this PR took 23.58s vs 23.58s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting WordPress with this PR took 15.36s vs 15.32s on main (0% slower) |
Generated by :no_entry_sign: Danger
waitbutY
Some tools (i.e. DataDog) require SARIF JSON format for code quality report ingestion.
This change adds a SARIF reporter to enable integration with these tools.
SARIF format documentation: