Closed SimplyDanny closed 5 months ago
17 Messages | |
---|---|
:book: | Linting Aerial with this PR took 0.18s vs 0.17s on main (5% slower) |
:book: | Linting Alamofire with this PR took 0.16s vs 0.16s on main (0% slower) |
:book: | Linting Brave with this PR took 0.68s vs 0.68s on main (0% slower) |
:book: | Linting DuckDuckGo with this PR took 0.54s vs 0.54s on main (0% slower) |
:book: | Linting Firefox with this PR took 1.19s vs 1.19s on main (0% slower) |
:book: | Linting Kickstarter with this PR took 0.75s vs 0.75s on main (0% slower) |
:book: | Linting Moya with this PR took 0.11s vs 0.11s on main (0% slower) |
:book: | Linting NetNewsWire with this PR took 0.29s vs 0.29s on main (0% slower) |
:book: | Linting Nimble with this PR took 0.13s vs 0.13s on main (0% slower) |
:book: | Linting PocketCasts with this PR took 0.66s vs 0.65s on main (1% slower) |
:book: | Linting Quick with this PR took 0.1s vs 0.1s on main (0% slower) |
:book: | Linting Realm with this PR took 0.52s vs 0.51s on main (1% slower) |
:book: | Linting Sourcery with this PR took 0.31s vs 0.32s on main (3% faster) |
:book: | Linting Swift with this PR took 0.44s vs 0.44s on main (0% slower) |
:book: | Linting VLC with this PR took 0.18s vs 0.18s on main (0% slower) |
:book: | Linting Wire with this PR took 1.74s vs 1.73s on main (0% slower) |
:book: | Linting WordPress with this PR took 1.05s vs 1.05s on main (0% slower) |
Generated by :no_entry_sign: Danger
Fixes #3141.
Also try to change the implementation slightly by focusing on the important aspects of the rule (i.e. extracting type names) in separate methods.