SwiftLintBot
commented
1 month ago | 17 Messages | |
|---|---|
| :book: | Linting Aerial with this PR took 0.17s vs 0.17s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Alamofire with this PR took 0.15s vs 0.15s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Brave with this PR took 0.66s vs 0.65s on main (1% slower) |
| :book: | Linting DuckDuckGo with this PR took 0.5s vs 0.5s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Firefox with this PR took 1.33s vs 1.32s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Kickstarter with this PR took 0.72s vs 0.72s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Moya with this PR took 0.11s vs 0.11s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting NetNewsWire with this PR took 0.26s vs 0.27s on main (3% faster) |
| :book: | Linting Nimble with this PR took 0.13s vs 0.13s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting PocketCasts with this PR took 0.62s vs 0.62s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Quick with this PR took 0.1s vs 0.1s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Realm with this PR took 0.51s vs 0.51s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Sourcery with this PR took 0.31s vs 0.31s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Swift with this PR took 0.42s vs 0.42s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting VLC with this PR took 0.18s vs 0.18s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting Wire with this PR took 1.7s vs 1.7s on main (0% slower) |
| :book: | Linting WordPress with this PR took 1.01s vs 1.01s on main (0% slower) |
Generated by :no_entry_sign: Danger
The fix is quite specific for this single case. What are other cases where an "unpack" can happen? We could further check if
iandeare actually used. But that's out of scope for this fix.Fixes #5573.