Referencing status for reapit.

reapit / foundations

Foundations platform mono repo

57 stars 22 forks source link

Referencing status for reapit. #10583

Open ajayayar opened 9 months ago

ajayayar commented 9 months ago

As a referencing provider we are sending the status of tenant reference completion.

Do you have any plan for reference status update? Tenant level.

Specification

Project: Reapit.Services.Tenancies
Enable GET /{id}/relationships/{relationshipId}/guarantors endpoint and duplicate mechanism for references
Enable PATCH /{id}/relationships/{relationshipId}/guarantors/{guarantorId} endpoint and duplicate mechanism for references. For the latter, it should only be possible to patch the reference status at this time as the type and other associated properties are set by the branch via the CRM
As an external developer, I should be able to mark a reference or guarantor status as requested/received/notSet

github-actions[bot] commented 9 months ago

Thank you for raising a feature request. Feature requests will be prioritised in accordance with our roadmap, customer and developer priorities. This request will be reviewed in our weekly refinement sessions and assigned to a specific project board or column, depending on the nature of the request and the development work required. For more information on our processes, please click here

plittlewood-rpt commented 9 months ago

Further information required - NP to reach out

plittlewood-rpt commented 9 months ago

@neilpellowe I've moved this out of the review column for now whilst you do your bits so it doesn't get in the way on todays refinement. Cheers

neilpellowe commented 9 months ago

@plittlewood-rpt - Ive had a response from Ajay via email regarding this request - we are scheduling a call to confirm final requirements.

neilpellowe commented 9 months ago

@plittlewood-rpt - Ok to proceed on this one on the basis of being able to update the existing tenant status options within Reapit. • Not applied for • Reference has been applied for • Reference received

plittlewood-rpt commented 9 months ago

@neilpellowe I've chased internal ticket PBI-5273. If there's a chance of making the data structures easier to work with, we should possibly wait until we do that.

github-actions[bot] commented 8 months ago

As this issue relates to AgencyCloud, we are unable to process this through the Platform in accordance with our Developer Processes. Issues relating to AgencyCloud should not be submitted via the Foundations GitHub repo but should be raised via the Reapit Service Desk by a Reapit Customer. Please ask a Reapit Customer to raise this issue via the Reapit Service Desk. For more information on our processes, please click here