Closed hivetom closed 7 months ago
Hi @hivetom, one of our engineers ran the same query via the swagger in the DeveloperPortal and that property was returned:
Hi @HollyJoyPhillips ,
Thanks for this. Is there a private/secure area where we can disclose real-world examples that are not SBOX data please?
Kind regards
Hi @hivetom, of course, you can send examples to sinfo@reapitfoundations.zendesk.com. Thanks.
Hi @hivetom, do you have any other examples or are happy for us to close this ticket?
We have recently requested additional information relating to the issue you have raised. Please can you take the time to review this ticket and where applicable, provide the information requested. For more information on our processes, please click here
Hi @HollyJoyPhillips I have sent a live example via email just now for you to review. Kind regards
Internal Issue '1041'
Hi @hivetom, I've replied to the ticket. Please confirm if that answers your query. Thanks.
Thank you @HollyJoyPhillips , that does indeed answer our query. Kind regards.
It looks like you have commented on a closed issue. If your comment relates to a bug or feature request, please open a new issue, and include this issue number/url for reference. For more information on our processes, please click here
Further to this issue, we have been advised by clients of additional properties not being imported where an arrangingTenancy tenancy is set. We have investigated this and replicated with SBOX data as follows:
Property: MKT210309 Tenancy: MKT210158 (status: Arranging Tenancy)
Using this query, we are unable to retrieve the aforementioned property:
properties?pageNumber=1&pageSize=100&officeId=MKT&embed=tenancies&marketingMode=letting&marketingMode=sellingAndLetting&lettingStatus=arrangingTenancy&lettingStatus=arrangingTenancyUnavailable&lettingStatus=tenancyCurrent
Fetching the property directly via its ID reveals:
Any info you could share on this would be greatly appreciated.
Kind regards
Originally posted by @hivetom in https://github.com/reapit/foundations/issues/10031#issuecomment-1936015989