several property's financial fields value on AC not exposed on the property service

[ss-dimasm]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. We have a requirements to GET and PATCH several fields on property's financial section, looks like these fields on AC haven't exposed on the property model. Can we add these to the current API spec on property? thanks. Let me know if you need more details

Sales Property

• Market Appraisal By
• Market Appraisal From
• Market Appraisal To

UI placement on AC (Sales)

Let Property

• Agency
• Inspected By

UI placement on AC (Let)

Describe the solution you'd like Could you please to add those fields to the current model, so we could access and update it via API.

FYI @craigforrest @saimonsaikat

[github-actions[bot]]

Thank you for raising a feature request. Feature requests will be prioritised in accordance with our roadmap, customer and developer priorities. This request will be reviewed in our weekly refinement sessions and assigned to a specific project board or column, depending on the nature of the request and the development work required. For more information on our processes, please click here

[plittlewood-rpt]

To research further - this doesn't look like the standard screen

[AshDeeming]

Hi @ss-dimasm Please could you confirm which build/database the above screenshots are from please?

[craigforrest]

Screenshots are from the Reapit Online Demo (ROD) build

The screenshots are from a property's Financial screen for sales:

and the rent/fee details for lettings:

Opening the screen in the build does not trigger a DLL which suggests a custom screen is not being used, and the only enabled config setting that I can see which would affect the screen is this:

[craigforrest]

@AshDeeming Let me know if this needs any further discussion

[plittlewood-rpt]

@craigforrest I'm going to split this up into multiple tickets as there's a lot been request here. I'll link the tickets once I've done it.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has been reviewed and is too big to be handled in a single issue and requires the need to be broken down by our development team. We will add the associated/dependent issues to this ticket when available. The individual tickets will then be review in our weekly refinement sessions. For more information on our processes, please click here

[plittlewood-rpt]

Selling Agency already available from GET /properties/ in PropertyModel.selling.agencyId (I don't recommend using agency because it doesn't support customisations

[craigforrest]

fyi @ss-dimasm

[ss-dimasm]

Thanks @plittlewood-rpt , we have include the selling agency field based on selling.agencyId instead selling.agency

[plittlewood-rpt]

@craigforrest the first screenshots from SS are of the Australia features. Can you just outline what's actually required here please for clarity? I would challenge the MA Date, Market Appraisal by and Instructed Date as these should really be inferred from appointments and journal entries and I'm of the opinion that this should be the way it should work in the CRM as well. @rpt-sabmatharu do you have any thoughts or opinions on this?