rebipp / ppi

REBIPP: Plant-Pollinator Interactions Data Vocabulary
https://ppi.rebipp.org.br
GNU General Public License v3.0
30 stars 5 forks source link

animalPlaceOfContact #28

Closed zedomel closed 3 years ago

zedomel commented 3 years ago
Field Value
GUID
Rebipp Class rebipp:Interaction
Label animalPlaceOfContact
Definition A list (concatenated and separated) of places (i.e. body parts) of the animal body that contacts its interacting partner during an Interaction.
Comments Recommended best practice is to separate the values in a list with space vertical bar space ( | ) and to use a controlled vocabulary.
Examples
Controlled vocabulary
Darwin Core Class Event
Cardinality One to one
Reference Protocol
fonturbel commented 3 years ago

This needs a further revision from a specialist

carmensspires commented 3 years ago

As we are trying to make inferences about which floral visitors would have the potential to be pollinators, I believe that we should specify in the definition the parts of the flower that are touched.

Definition proposals: A list (concatenated and separated) of places (i.e. body parts) of the animal body that contacts anther and stigma of its interacting partner during an Interaction.

Or

A list (concatenated and separated) of places (i.e. body parts) of the animal body that contacts anthers and stigma during an Interaction.

Or

A list (concatenated and separated) of places (i.e. body parts) of the animal body that contacts reproductive parts of the flower during an Interaction.

zedomel commented 3 years ago

@carmensspires I don't know if we need to include the parts of the flower in the definition.

It will restrict the usage of the term to only floral parts, opposed to allow a generic usage where the animal touches another parts of the plant (leaf, trunk, etc).

By the way, the floral parts when touched must be specified using the term plantPlaceOfContact(#31). Using the term placePlaceOfContact one can specify values as: anther or stigma.

Mardiore commented 3 years ago

If the intention is to record interactions (regardless of whether they result in pollination or not) I agree that it is better not to mention specific parts of the plant, such as floral structures.

anselmoeco commented 3 years ago

I agree with @zedomel and @Mardiore. However, if we want to at least refer to the interactions between animals and plants, we could then use something like: "A list (concatenated and separated) of places (i.e. body parts) of the animal body that contacts the plant partner during an Interaction".

zedomel commented 3 years ago

New definition: A list (concatenated and separated) of animal's body parts that contacts the plant

Removed partner during an Interaction since it the interaction with a plant is implicit here (Interaction class)