Closed zedomel closed 3 years ago
Field | Value |
---|---|
GUID | |
Rebipp Class | rebipp:Interaction |
Label | fruitSet |
Definition | Percentage of flowers exposed to floral visitors during anthesis that set fruit. |
Comments | |
Examples | |
Controlled vocabulary | |
Darwin Core Class | Event |
Cardinality | One to one |
Reference Protocol |
Can we have fruitset from flowers not exposed (i.e. bagged)? If so, should we change the term definition to be general enough to allow sharing fruitset from bagged flowers?
In #41 I have suggested the creation of a new term flowerState
, but perhaps it should be something like flowerTreatment
, since the exposed, bagged, etc. conditions are different treatments for collecting the same measurement.
I have found some examples of fruit set that are not directly related to the Interactions
:
So, it is possible that a fruit set will not have any Interaction
linked to it. But it can represent an outcome from multiple interactions that occurred in a plant or a set of plant individuals. How use it in conjunction with Interaction
class and other terms?
Definition proposal: "Proportion of the pollinated flowers that yielded fruits"
I agree with the proposal of @fonturbel , which makes the definition more general.
I agree with @fonturbel
I also agree with @fonturbel proposal.
New definition: Proportion of the pollinated flowers that yielded fruits