Open AshishNaware opened 1 month ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 16.66667%
with 5 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 58.85%. Comparing base (
7437a9b
) to head (c533767
). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
testing/config.go | 0.00% | 2 Missing and 1 partial :warning: |
testing/client.go | 33.33% | 2 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Hi @AshishNaware. Thanks for the contribution. This change is heading in the right direction, but is also incomplete as it has no runtime effect. WithWatchReactors
needs to be plumbed into the test cases (ReconcilerTestCase
/SubReconcilerTestCase
/AdmissionWebhookTestCase
) the same way WithReactors
is. That part is relatively simple. The more complicated part will be consuming the WatchReactionFunc
. The client wrapper doesn't currently implement Watch
that method will need to be implemented and consume the reaction funcs. The DuckAwareClientWrapper
also needs to have Watch
added.
Let me know if you need any pointers into the code base.
Hi @AshishNaware. Thanks for the contribution. This change is heading in the right direction, but is also incomplete as it has no runtime effect.
WithWatchReactors
needs to be plumbed into the test cases (ReconcilerTestCase
/SubReconcilerTestCase
/AdmissionWebhookTestCase
) the same wayWithReactors
is. That part is relatively simple. The more complicated part will be consuming theWatchReactionFunc
. The client wrapper doesn't currently implementWatch
that method will need to be implemented and consume the reaction funcs. TheDuckAwareClientWrapper
also needs to haveWatch
added.Let me know if you need any pointers into the code base.
Hey. Thanks for the feedback. Let me dig more into the code-base. I will create a thread here if i have any questions :)
@scothis - I just took a quick glance at the code and I see a Watch method already implemented for duckAwareClientWrapper that returns a watch.Interface. I assume that we need a similar implementation for the clientWrapper as well. thoughts?
I assume that we need a similar implementation for the clientWrapper as well. thoughts?
Yep. This is also where the watch reaction funcs should be applied.
This PR adds ability to install watch reaction function to the fake client. This will help in writing tests where its required to simulate behavior of the watcher.