recsyschallenge / 2017

40 stars 24 forks source link

Question about "num_accepted_recos" #47

Closed tawatawara closed 7 years ago

tawatawara commented 7 years ago

Hi, I have a question about num_accepted_recos. I submitted the file which includes 7316 user-item pairs, then I got the response as below:

{"num_accepted_recos":1476}

However, the submission I got by GET /api/online/submission includes 7316 user-item pairs, and this file's content is same as the file I submitted. (and, each user appears there only once. )

What is this difference ? I misunderstand the meaning of num_accepted_recos (the number of user-item pairs) ?

Thanks,

team chome

dkohlsdorf commented 7 years ago

We have some problems with timeouts. I will look into it today. However, try to submit the not accepted multiple times and use the get/submission endpoint to check if it worked.

Daniel

On 02 May 2017, at 08:46, tawatawara <notifications@github.com mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

Hi, I have a question about num_accepted_recos. I submitted the file which includes 7316 user-item pairs, then I got the response as below:

{"num_accepted_recos":1476} However, the submission I got by GET /api/online/submission https://github.com/recsyschallenge/2017/tree/master/api#get-apionlinesubmission includes 7316 user-item pairs, and this file's content is same as the file I submitted.

What is this difference ? I misunderstand the meaning of num_accepted_recos (the number of user-item pairs) ?

Thanks,

team chome

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/recsyschallenge/2017/issues/47, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABXAG6QF0B3k_vjOd7WA4YPwD-qGXhkfks5r1tFOgaJpZM4NNxOu.

tawatawara commented 7 years ago

Thanks, and I have another question.

My assumptions is that num_accepted_recos is smaller than the true value but the submission got by GET /api/online/submission was really accepted.

Am I right ?

dkohlsdorf commented 7 years ago

Correct!