Closed tmfrnz closed 4 years ago
S1.2 does not have a map (it is distributed everywhere, both in land and seafloor), not sure if it is better to show no map at all, or a map all in red? Would it be possible to display an image instead of the map, like in the biome pages?
Regarding MFT1.1: there are two or three other maps with point locality data, is there a way to add point markers for those?
S1.2 does not have a map (it is distributed everywhere, both in land and seafloor), not sure if it is better to show no map at all, or a map all in red? Would it be possible to display an image instead of the map, like in the biome pages?
Yes it would be possible to show an image, however we would probably prefer to make the map red everywhere. Ideally this would come out of a GIS layer (as this will not require any additional work, also we can use that same layer for our analysis)
Regarding MFT1.1: there are two or three other maps with point locality data, is there a way to add point markers for those?
We could indeed also add point markers however another option would be to map the true (albeit small) extent of these groups as areas and use some additional highlight layers (ie buffered areas) to enhance the data's visibility as suggested here in option 2: https://github.com/red-list-ecosystem/typology-map/issues/30
Benefits would include
This is what it might look like (we would probably go for a similar style when using map markers, however marking the circles center)
Added a placeholder rectangle for S1.2 and copied the SM1.1 layer for SM1.2 (very similar distribution)
MFT1.1 is now based on Deltas at risk layer !
@jrfep in addition to #1, here a list of other maps with problems: