Closed rbs-jacob closed 1 year ago
@rbs-jacob, shouldn't we have a bugfix in the changelog? This could end up being 3.0.1
.
@rbs-jacob, shouldn't we have a bugfix in the changelog? This could end up being
3.0.1
.
I wasn't sure about updating the changelog, because I'm not sure if this qualifies as a 3.0.0
post release, or whether it's a minor version bump of its own. Sounds like you want me to update it, though.
I wasn't sure about updating the changelog, because I'm not sure if this qualifies as a
3.0.0
post release, or whether it's a minor version bump of its own. Sounds like you want me to update it, though.
@rbs-jacob, this seems like something that should go in "Fixed" in a change log. It isn't a minor version but a patch version bum, so it would be released as 3.0.1
. Please add a "Fixed" entry in the change log.
One sentence summary of this PR (This should go in the CHANGELOG!)
Running
pip install ofrak
installs version3.0.0
and, for some reason, seems to install the lowest possible version ofimportlib-metadata
(1.4.0). This old version does not actually support all of the features of the library we are using. This PR bumps the version.Anyone you think should look at this, specifically?
@whyitfor