grantj-re3
commented
8 years ago Regarding item A above, I have found some old examples at RDA demo of showing lack of inverse linking via Related Objects.
- https://demo.ands.org.au/registry/registry_object/view/237084 shows a collection record with 2x related objects to services (with types "isProducedBy" and "hasValueAddedBy")
- https://demo.ands.org.au/registry/registry_object/view/237086 shows one of the services with related object type of "hasAssociationWith" (but should have type "produces")
- https://demo.ands.org.au/registry/registry_object/view/237087 shows the other service with related object type of "hasAssociationWith" (but should have type "addsValueTo")
ghost
ReDBox-Mint 1.6.1
A) Problem with reverse relationship shown in Mint
I don't know if this is a Mint or ReDBox issue, but the RIF-CS for a service record always seems to show the relationship to the collection as "hasAssociationWith". I think it should show the reverse relationship of that selected in the ReDBox Related Services in the Description tab.
B) Problem with a collection record's representation of a service in RIF-CS
If I link to a service record (using Related Services in the Description tab on the main workflow) the resulting RIF-CS has three components regarding the service as follows. (Note that I have modified Mint home/harvest/Services.json to use the handle transformer for curation.)
a) a "related-object" where the object's key is a handle [good]
b) a "related-object" where the object's key is a local ID (ie. redboxmint_flinders_edu_au/services/3) [bad for me because 1) I do not want to show the local ID externally, only the handle; 2) this is a repeat of item-a (but I did not check to see how RDA interprets it)]
c) "related-info" with the text description of the service and URI of the local ID (ie. redboxmint_flinders_edu_au/services/3) [bad for me because 1) this element is interpreted by RDA as another service (although it is the same service as item-a); 2) this ID is not a URI but RDA tries to interpret it as one which results in an invalid hyperlink]
Hence I removed these 2 lines from my config (hopefully without other side-effects):
https://github.com/redbox-mint/redbox/blob/redbox-1.6.1/config/src/main/config/home/templates/rif.vm#L333-334
This means that the following code fragment allows services to be shown in a similar (RIF-CS) manner as person and local-project records:
https://github.com/redbox-mint/redbox/blob/redbox-1.6.1/config/src/main/config/home/templates/rif.vm#L234-256