Closed GoldenBadger closed 7 years ago
Im not a big fan of replacing the license i prefer bsd
edit: i had a senior moment i meant mit
Approved by admins, webmaster & chair, merging this soon unless someone has a good reason not to.
I still haven't heard a reason, just nods of approval, I'm wondering were a move to copyleft is coming from as redbrick is normally unlicenced or mit
It seems we were not using the MIT license correctly anyway, as we do not include a copyright notice.
Note, we can change the copyright notice to something like Copyright (C) 2017 the official Redbrick website contributors
.
the definition of official is ambiguous
What do you recommend we change it to? It is the officially-supported website.
reading of it seems you are saying official contributors rather then contributors to the official website
I will reword.
The committee held a vote regarding the change from the MIT license to the GPL-3.0 during the meeting on Monday 23/10/2017. Of the members present (11/12), 10 voted in favor of the change and 1 abstained. As such, we will merge this change to the license of the Redbrick website. On top of this, we have established that the GPL is completely compatible with MIT so there will be no issues moving to this license.
If approved, all code on the repo after that point will be licensed under the GPLv3.