Open osiengse opened 1 year ago
Sorry I missed this, I've been overwhelmed.
Your PR is not the right solution.
There are few scenarios envisioned.
The most common that the role tries to default to, in this order:
The base image and the destination registry are the same, so they use the same authentication. This is why the base user/pass defaults to the ee_registery user/pass, its assuming you are pulling/pushing from/to a galaxy/automation hub
You are pulling the base image from registry.redhat.io, or someplace like a private repository separate from the destionation. This means you set the base auth different from the destionation auth, as you cannot write to the base auth
You are pulling from a public repo that doesn't need authentication, so you would set the base user/pass as "" This is the least likely scenario, as you are more likely to use ee_update_base_images set to false to not pull base images from the start.
Trying to figure out how to make this better for documentation, but these are the cases its built around, If you have a case that doesn't match these 3, comment here, and can figure out how best to change things. However change the behavior as you've set out would break things for users as is.
Summary
Default value of ee_base_registry_username & ee_base_registry_password is declared as ee_registry_username & ee_registry_password in README.md when in fact ee_registry_username & ee_registry_password default value is ee_base_registry_username & ee_base_registry_password
Issue Type