Closed djdanielsson closed 2 months ago
Please see my reply on #182 .
https://github.com/redhat-cop/infra.leapp/issues/182#issuecomment-2078504666
In summary, unless we have evidence that package doesn't work, I think we should stay with package. If we do have evidence that package doesn't work, then analysis-preupg.yml also has package with enablerepo and should also be changed.
I don't see a reason to keep package really, I think we could easily change them all to yum because that will use dnf if available. This isn't a multi OS automation it's strictly for RHEL
That being said, I would need to search where else we use package and change those if we do that so don't merge this
Can you help me to understand what the problem is with package? Previously, I was instructed that it is the "best" option. I've never seen a problem with it. For #182 package wasn't the issue.
that is fine, I personally don't care that much either way.
this is a fix for the issue #182 there is no value in using package because Leapp only works on RHEL based systems so using yum and dnf will always work.