WIP: Trying to cycle through all directories in tests/

[etsauer]

What does this PR do?

Brief explanation of the code or documentation change you've made

How should this be tested?

Include commands to run your new feature, and also post-run commands to validate that it worked. (please use code blocks to format code samples)

Is there a relevant Issue open for this?

Provide a link to any open issues that describe the problem you are solving.

Who would you like to review this?

cc: @redhat-cop/openshift-applier

[sabre1041]

@etsauer this is where I got thus far. It succeeds in looping through the directories

diff --git a/molecule/default/playbook.yml b/molecule/default/playbook.yml
index 0c5dd66..b9bb5d8 100644
--- a/molecule/default/playbook.yml
+++ b/molecule/default/playbook.yml
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
       find:
         paths: "{{ playbook_dir }}/../../tests/inventories"
         file_type: directory
-        depth: 1
-        recurse: yes
+        recurse: no
       register: tests
+      delegate_to: localhost
   tasks:
     - include: tasks.yml
       with_items: "{{ tests.files }}"
diff --git a/molecule/default/tasks.yml b/molecule/default/tasks.yml
index 0c79d2f..463ce76 100644
--- a/molecule/default/tasks.yml
+++ b/molecule/default/tasks.yml
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 ---
 - name: Setting Location of Inventory Directory
   set_fact:
-    inventory_dir: "{{ (playbook_dir ~ inventory) | realpath }}"
+    inventory_dir: "{{ inventory.path | realpath }}"
 - name: Include Inventory
   include_vars:
-    dir: "{{inventory}}"
+    dir: "{{ inventory_dir }}/group_vars"
 - name: OpenShift Applier Role
   include_role:
     name: "{{ (playbook_dir ~ '/../../roles/openshift-applier') | realpath }}"

However, it is failing on the pre-post-steps inventory as it is using the galaxy_requirements directory which currently does not support copying to a remote host. @oybed would love your thoughts on how we might be able to support this feature to align with the rest of the files (raw files and templates)

[etsauer]

@sabre1041 updated the branch with some of this. I'm getting the same error now.

[etsauer]

@oybed @sabre1041 closing this, as there is a new implementation coming down the pipe.