Open angelozerr opened 2 weeks ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 24.38%. Comparing base (
83ab37a
) to head (c1ec7c4
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
I'm trying to write the same lua file than initial issue but the hover doesn't send the same response (param doesn't appear), but I have tested by writing jsdoc in a ts file:
/**
* ```lua
function f(a:aa) -> nil
```
___
```plaintext
params: a
```
___
*/
function foo() {
}
foo()
And here the result:
I think we should keep the code blocks. That's how intellij shows code snippets
LSP4IJ's behavior is consistent with that.
Maybe @CppCXY's issue is the block's background seems darker on completion, compared to hover. Not sure what we can do about it.
fix: The plaintext rendering color on the completion document is too dark.
Fixes #368