Closed yetanothertw closed 3 years ago
@emmurphy1 @adahms @sterobin just making sure you're aware of this issue, that is if you can validate that it is an issue indeed. Many thanks
Thanks for raising this issue, @yetanothertw!
A review of the module suggests the examples are consistent with themselves - i.e. the context and title in the top example match one another, and the context and title in the actual module piece match one another - but are not consistent with one another.
@emmurphy1 @sterobin - would making these two sets the same reduce some confusion?
Thanks, Emily!
@adahms this issue was updated in PR 164, and merged.
In the procedure module template [1], in the "Base the file name and the ID on the module title. For example:" section (block comment), the recommendation for the module ID format is (line 8):
and then after this section (block comment) the example uses the following ID (line 14): [id="proc-doing-one-procedure_{context}"]
I think they should both be [id="proc-doing-one-procedure_{context}"], so line 8 needs to be updated.
[1] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redhat-documentation/modular-docs/master/modular-docs-manual/files/TEMPLATE_PROCEDURE_doing-one-procedure.adoc