Open ioggstream opened 7 years ago
bastion-ansible.sh to be run
it is not run
injecting infra host-id into node.yaml:run_ansible I can notify if an infra node have been replaced.
This will trigger bastion-ansible.sh / ansible-playbook main.yaml that will reconfigure the node.
Do you see any drawback?
diff --git a/node.yaml b/node.yaml index 91fb064..4c20b55 100644 --- a/node.yaml +++ b/node.yaml @@ -419,6 +419,10 @@ parameters: type: boolean description: Enable http authentication or use another backend via extra_openshift_ansible_params. default: true + + all_infra_ids: + type: string + description: A list of server ids conditions: root_volume: false @@ -834,6 +838,8 @@ resources: default: {get_param: internal_subnet} - name: fixed_subnet default: {get_param: fixed_subnet} + - name: all_infra_ids + default: {get_param: all_infra_ids} outputs: - name: ca_cert - name: ca_key diff --git a/openshift.yaml b/openshift.yaml index ba8c6c8..b9ba120 100644 --- a/openshift.yaml +++ b/openshift.yaml @@ -893,6 +893,10 @@ resources: list_join: - " " - {get_attr: [openshift_infra_nodes, hostname]} + all_infra_ids: + list_join: + - " " + - {get_attr: [openshift_infra_nodes, host]} container_quota: {get_param: container_quota}
when
I expect
bastion-ansible.sh to be run
instead
it is not run
idea
injecting infra host-id into node.yaml:run_ansible I can notify if an infra node have been replaced.
This will trigger bastion-ansible.sh / ansible-playbook main.yaml that will reconfigure the node.
Do you see any drawback?