search

redhat-performance / scale-ci-ansible

The Scale CI automation Ansible playbooks
4 stars 7 forks source link

Adjusting size of m4.2xlarge sized flavor #143

Closed akrzos closed 6 years ago

akrzos commented 6 years ago

DNM - Do not merge yet. I am currently testing this flavor size for the app-nodes to see if we can fit the size we need.

Thanks.

jeremyeder commented 6 years ago

did you really mean 1280?

akrzos commented 6 years ago

did you really mean 1280?

Yes, I "added" 1024 to reduce the flavor size, so the total reduction would be 256 and 1024, but we can try out just 1024 to be a more easily explainable number too.

akrzos commented 6 years ago

So this fit, so we can merge now or further fine tune if we want to maximize the memory on m4.2xlarge.

mbruzek commented 6 years ago

I heard the discussion about this at the meeting. It sounds like this was required to fit more VMs on a compute node.