Closed tishun closed 5 months ago
Would you mind backporting the pom changes to 6.2.x
as well?
Attention: Patch coverage is 86.79245%
with 7 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 77.71%. Comparing base (
a91d701
) to head (3709583
).:exclamation: Current head 3709583 differs from pull request most recent head 9c36afe. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9c36afe to get more accurate results
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/main/java/io/lettuce/core/RedisClient.java | 64.28% | 4 Missing and 1 partial :warning: |
...main/java/io/lettuce/core/AbstractRedisClient.java | 0.00% | 2 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Would you mind backporting the pom changes to
6.2.x
as well?
Not at all.
Oh, my bad ... why did I do that
Would you mind backporting the pom changes to
6.2.x
as well?
Hey @mp911de , what about the 6.3.x
?
During the review of #2838 it was noticed that there are code formatting issues with the code that is already submitted in the repo. To avoid having these in the future I've added a step in the maven build to format the code.
As part of this the whole codebase was reformatted accordingly.
In the future, if the right formatter is used, there would be no formatting changes required in PRs.
Make sure that:
[x] You submit test cases (unit or integration tests) that back your changes.