Closed sroze closed 6 years ago
I honestly don't know much about this repo. If it doesn't use any of Node's libraries, then it's probably fine. If it does use Node libraries, then a major version change could actually be breaking, and it would be good practice to record the version against which it was designed/built/tested.
As I said, though, I have zero context on this repo, and no strong opinions, so if this is genuinely blocking, go ahead and remove it.
This lib doesn't use any Node libraries, so no harm from there. Perhaps it would be more appropriate to have the engines as such:
"engines": {
"node": ">8",
"npm": ">5"
},
But as @sroze said, this doesn't bring much value at this point, so lets remove. Thank you for comments and PR! 🙌
@sroze Just published v1.0.3 with this removed, FYI.
Great, thank you! On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 at 16:47, Pedro Machado Santa notifications@github.com wrote:
@sroze https://github.com/sroze Just published v1.0.3 https://github.com/reedsy/quill-cursors/releases/tag/v1.0.3 with this removed, FYI.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/reedsy/quill-cursors/pull/10#issuecomment-380500878, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAxHEQrivuOMWlBg1g_SlvipRoHFPx1bks5tniV8gaJpZM4TP0bj .
Using Node 9.x is perfectly fine for example. As I don't see any value of having such thing in the dependencies, I propose to remove them :)