Closed bazeli closed 6 years ago
Is there a reason why you wouldn't use the same port from the login url? I'm wondering if the copy_port parameter is necessary, or if one would always have the same port on the capabilities as the login url
Agreed - that would be the more logical choice, but given the potential impact of the change I thought it best to make it optional. Last thing anyone wants is broken code. Up to you though.
The actions listed on the login page only ever show the URI. So I don't think the port would ever change from the login to other actions on the server. I don't think it would be breaking, and if it turns out to be we can address it.
You should see this in 0.4.5
Hey there-
Much thanks for this helpful timesaver of a lib. I ran into an issue with a Rapattoni RETS server running on a non-standard port (ie not 80 or 443). After a bit of debugging, I made a small fix to support these cases. Default behavior doesn't change for anyone - I decided to make it opt-in based on research done with other RETS servers.
Let me know if you would like me to create a PR. Cheers!
https://github.com/bazeli/rets/commit/3498de3e242b31faf39403061da1aea28b5b9a04