Certificate upgrades for Gold Standard, ACR, CAR, Plan Vivo registries

[erikalogie]

Similar to the exercise that we did for Verra with Sotheby's, see how these other third parties map onto our ontology:

• https://registry.goldstandard.org/credit-blocks?q=&page=1&project_types=%2C21
• https://acr2.apx.com/myModule/rpt/myrpt.asp?r=112
• https://thereserve2.apx.com/myModule/rpt/myrpt.asp?r=111

Design Artifacts for Issuance Certificates:

• Gold Standard: https://www.figma.com/file/bY5PBiij1nAdafyshCMvXr/New-Project-Page-Design-for-Wilmot-and-Other-Impact-Ag-Projects?node-id=1844%3A63955
• Plan Vivo: https://www.figma.com/file/bY5PBiij1nAdafyshCMvXr/New-Project-Page-Design-for-Wilmot-and-Other-Impact-Ag-Projects?node-id=1845%3A64497
• American Carbon Registry: https://www.figma.com/file/bY5PBiij1nAdafyshCMvXr/New-Project-Page-Design-for-Wilmot-and-Other-Impact-Ag-Projects?node-id=1845%3A65258
• Climate Action Reserve: https://www.figma.com/file/bY5PBiij1nAdafyshCMvXr/New-Project-Page-Design-for-Wilmot-and-Other-Impact-Ag-Projects?node-id=1845%3A66150

[erikalogie]

@rsteinhe this is ready to review

[rsteinhe]

@erikalogie I don't have the links in each corresponding project you based this on which might have been helpful. But anyway, from a design standpoint, this looks fine, I don't see any difference between the different registries on the certificate side (which is great) and we mainly need to do the schema mapping more clearly for the different registries.

I created this issue to track that - https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/regen-registry-5f8998bec8958d000f4609e2/issues/regen-network/regen-registry/621

[erikalogie]

Ok, sounds good