Closed erikalogie closed 2 years ago
@erikalogie why is this blocked on https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/regen-registry-5f8998bec8958d000f4609e2/issues/regen-network/regen-registry/868?
Hey team! Please add your planning poker estimate with ZenHub @haveanicedavid @mhagel @victordelval
@blushi because I assumed that dev needs the design of where to put the new fields on the page first
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:31 AM Marie Gauthier @.***> wrote:
Hey team! Please add your planning poker estimate https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/Regen-Registry-5f8998bec8958d000f4609e2/issues/regen-network/regen-registry/870?planning-poker with ZenHub @haveanicedavid https://github.com/haveanicedavid @mhagel https://github.com/mhagel @victordelval https://github.com/victordelval
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/regen-network/regen-registry/issues/870#issuecomment-1081515597, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACARPTOU3MHQCUUX4YNP5RTVCKWULANCNFSM5R3VY2RQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
@mhagel this is ready to work on
@mhagel Put in a PR here with some batch data if you're ready to toy around with it: https://github.com/regen-network/regen-registry-ops/blob/sam/C01-pilot-batches/C01/credit-batch-metadata/C01-20150101-20151231-002.json
@S4mmyb should we also remove regen:vintageYear
? It wasn't mentioned in this issue, but it is in a previous metadata interface in the front end.
Also, I think we need add a '@list' identifier to the additionalCerts array, as such:
nevermind - I understand that the @list
is explained in the context now.
@erikalogie Ready for feedback: https://deploy-preview-910--regen-registry.netlify.app/credit-batches/C01-20190101-20210101-008
Looks good to me!
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 1:12 PM Mark Hagelberg @.***> wrote:
@erikalogie https://github.com/erikalogie Ready for feedback:
https://deploy-preview-910--regen-registry.netlify.app/credit-batches/C01-20190101-20210101-008
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/regen-network/regen-registry/issues/870#issuecomment-1106706348, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACARPTM26OCLBXJJCMHSZHDVGLMWPANCNFSM5R3VY2RQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
@S4mmyb should we also remove
regen:vintageYear
? It wasn't mentioned in this issue, but it is in a previous metadata interface in the front end.
Hey @mhagel, the vintage year should also be removed, yes. The vintage year should be calculated based on the start and end date parameters in the batch issuance ecocredit spec: https://github.com/regen-network/regen-ledger/blob/e4e9a152c2cc28494946b33280a04538cdded0e7/proto/regen/ecocredit/v1/state.proto#L143
https://www.figma.com/file/seUiQM2SPt78KJiDL0Ea8m/Basic-Ecocredits-Ledger-View?node-id=1448%3A95862
Get rid of the verification and monitoring docs and add the additional certifications here rather than on the project page.