search

regexident / AsyncOperation

A hassle-free implementation of asynchronous NSOperations/NSBlockOperations.
Other
23 stars 5 forks source link

Feature request - Swift Package #5

Open robwithhair opened 6 years ago

robwithhair commented 6 years ago

Hi there. Thanks for making this repo. This is a really useful class to add to projects.

I was wondering if you had considered making it a swift package so it could be easily used with the Swift Package Manager? It would make receiving updates easier on older projects and allow it to be used more easily on the server.

regexident commented 6 years ago

Hi Rob,

thanks for the feature request! AsyncOperation is rather low-priority among my projects though, as I built it as a kind of proof-of-concept back then and never really used it for anything serious.

As such I currently don't have the bandwidth to prepare a spm manifest for it. I'd be more than happy though to merge a PR if anyone were to submit one. cough :wink:

robwithhair commented 6 years ago

I was going to suggest that, however I think the structure of the repo would be forced to change and this might have a knock effect on carthage etc. I don’t know if it should be set up as a separate repo for SPM or something else. What do you think?

On 23 Oct 2018, at 12:52, Vincent Esche notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi Rob,

thanks for the feature request! AsyncOperation is rather low-priority among my projects though, as I built it as a kind of proof-of-concept back then and never really used it for anything serious.

As such I currently don't have the bandwidth to prepare a spm manifest for it. I'd be more than happy though to merge a PR if anyone were to submit one. cough 😉

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/regexident/AsyncOperation/issues/5#issuecomment-432215414, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGYdlROikAfh-BB2fqvRUG0UwnRawEWSks5unwMEgaJpZM4X1D_5.

regexident commented 6 years ago

I'd rather not have two separate configs to be honest. Given how small the project is I'd reckon that "just" moving the appropriate files into "Sources" and "Tests" might be enough, almost?