Related to issue #28. User searches by tag, clicks on another, realizes the want the UNION of the previous and current results.
logically related to #48 and #50 but no dependencies on implementation with 50. 48 and 49 can go in either order but likely the 49 would use feature from 48.
Related to issue #28. User searches by tag, clicks on another, realizes the want the UNION of the previous and current results.
logically related to #48 and #50 but no dependencies on implementation with 50. 48 and 49 can go in either order but likely the 49 would use feature from 48.