Closed Bryan2333 closed 2 months ago
Ahoi, thanks for your contribution!
-r
?tr
command. And yes, it is fine to use the original one. Sorry for bringing confusion.I'm afraid not, because I'm not familiar with the test framework.
Too bad. I had hoped you might be willing to try and copy-paste something together, if my test setup was simple enough ... oh well. It was just copy past, see c68660ab8051b041309c9ba97923475218347587.
No, I just want to replace the tr command. And yes, it is fine to use the original one. Sorry for bringing confusion.
Gotcha, no worries. I'm fine with avoiding tr
, but I think we can drop -r
?
Couldn't figure out how to push to your PR (did you check the box to allow maintainer edits? 🤔) so I'm closing this in favor of #51.
Thanks again!
FWIW:
I think we can drop
-r
I checked; no, we can't. Apparently, string replace
only handles escapes such as \n
properly in regex-mode. 🙄 The more you know!
I improved the plugin, here are some points: