Open ronaldtse opened 2 years ago
See original issue for latest investigation results. (reposted information below)
From https://github.com/relaton/relaton-3gpp/issues/1#issuecomment-991844813
Some further insights from the screenshot:
As @andrew2net mentioned, the magical thing is both records have a "release" value of Ph1
. However in the screenshot these two entries split into "Phase 1" and "Phase 2"! How is that even possible?
I found two places that have "02.08" listed as Phase 1 and Phase 2:
Now downloading the latest 2021-12-05 DB to see if there are any changes...
From https://github.com/relaton/relaton-3gpp/issues/1#issuecomment-991864990:
I am not sure if 3GPP has a different database, but in the 2001-04-25_schedule
table we can see data from 2021-12-03, which is super recent. This would indicate that at least this table is likely authoritative. So I don't understand how they placed the same record in "Phase 1" vs "Phase 2" that way.
However, I just found this table: 2003-04-10_webexp04_release-and-version-details_table
.
This data is correct! Yet the newest data for this table is only until 2013.
So it is very possible that there is another table (e.g. release-and-version-details_table
) that contains the correct information, but it is not published.
From @andrew2net .
In the DB there are two "0.2.1" versions with not nil
3guId
for spec02.08
and releasePh1
(Phase 1). For spec02.08
and releasePh2
(Phase 2) there isn't any "0.2.1" version:on the 3GPP portal one "0.2.1" version is displayed in "Phase 1" and one in "Phase 2" https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=35
Originally posted by @andrew2net in https://github.com/relaton/relaton-3gpp/issues/1#issuecomment-991740310