Some CIPM references are not fetching

[manuelfuenmayor]

In relation to https://github.com/metanorma/bipm-si-brochure/issues/145

Following identifiers are not fetching:

CIPM Resolution 43
CIPM Resolution 51
CIPM Resolution 59
CIPM Resolution 62

Like I've stated in this thread: https://github.com/relaton/relaton-bipm/issues/17 Numbers correspond to the Meeting, not the Resolution.

The correspondence with original document is as follows: CIPM Resolution 43 -> (PV, 22, 92) CIPM Resolution 51 -> (PV, 30, 27) CIPM Resolution 59 -> (PV, 38, 110-111) CIPM Resolution 62 -> (PV, 1879, 41)

For CIPM Resolution 59 there is data available in the web: https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/ci/cipm/59-1970, so the fetching should occur in this case. I can't say the same for the others, however.

[ronaldtse]

Numbers correspond to the Meeting, not the Resolution.

What do you mean? Do you want to cite using the Meeting number, or the Resolution number?

[ronaldtse]

The correct format is specified here: https://github.com/metanorma/metanorma-bipm/issues/164

From Janet Miles of the BIPM:

For the Resolutions/Recommendations/Decisions I think the following simple rule works without any ambiguity:

English:

[BODY] [Type] {number} (YEAR)

(where the number can be omitted if necessary, and the Type will be Resolution/Recommendation/Declaration as appropriate).

French (in French an additional dash is required as follows):

[BODY] - [Type] {number} (YEAR)

(and of course the Type has to be specified in French : Résolution, Recommandation, Déclaration…)

Examples:

CGPM Resolution 6 (1987)
CIPM Resolution (1948)
CCDS Recommendation 2 (1970)

We are no longer using these:

The correspondence with original document is as follows: CIPM Resolution 43 -> (PV, 22, 92) CIPM Resolution 51 -> (PV, 30, 27) CIPM Resolution 59 -> (PV, 38, 110-111) CIPM Resolution 62 -> (PV, 1879, 41)

[manuelfuenmayor]

This is anwsered. Thanks!