relaton / relaton-bipm

MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

(URGNET) Identifier to retrieve CCDS Recommendation 2 (1970) #20

Closed manuelfuenmayor closed 2 years ago

manuelfuenmayor commented 2 years ago

We need to reference this page: https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cc/cctf/5-1970/resolution-2. What would be the correct identifier to retrieve data from 1970-02.yaml?

manuelfuenmayor commented 2 years ago

We also need to refer to this page: https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/ci/cipm/50-1961/resolution-

ronaldtse commented 2 years ago

@manuel489 the proper identifier is "CCDS Resolution 1970-05" or "CCTF Resolution 1970-05". Does this not work?

We also need to refer to this page: https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/ci/cipm/50-1961/resolution-

The data source of this resolution is available at https://github.com/metanorma/bipm-data-outcomes/blob/main/cipm/meetings-en/meeting-50.yml

manuelfuenmayor commented 2 years ago

the proper identifier is "CCDS Resolution 1970-05" or "CCTF Resolution 1970-05". Does this not work?

@ronaldtse, seems like it is not working yet:

[relaton-calconnect] ("CCDS Resolution 1970-05") fetching...
[relaton-calconnect] ("CCTF Resolution 1970-05") fetching...
[relaton-calconnect] WARNING: no match found online for CCDS Resolution 1970-05. The code must be exactly like it is on the standards website.
[relaton-calconnect] WARNING: no match found online for CCTF Resolution 1970-05. The code must be exactly like it is on the standards website.

Curiously, the identifiers are being related to CALCONNECT instead of BIPM. I've compiled with relaton-bipm 1.11.6.

manuelfuenmayor commented 2 years ago

I've also tried with CCDS Recommendation 02 (1970) as identifier. Which should be the proper way?

[relaton-calconnect] ("CCDS Recommendation 02 (1970)") fetching...
[relaton-calconnect] WARNING: no match found online for CCDS Recommendation 02. The code must be exactly like it is on the standards website.
ronaldtse commented 2 years ago

Curiously, the identifiers are being related to CALCONNECT instead of BIPM.

That is wrong. @andrew2net can you please help here?

andrew2net commented 2 years ago

Curiously, the identifiers are being related to CALCONNECT instead of BIPM.

it's fixed in the relaton-bipm 1.11.7 and relaton 1.11.3

the proper identifier is "CCDS Resolution 1970-05" or "CCTF Resolution 1970-05". Does this not work?

We don't have CCDS body in bipm-data-outcomes. For CCTF body there are "CCTF Recommendation 1970-02" and "CCTF Meetings 5" document.

manuelfuenmayor commented 2 years ago

We don't have CCDS body in bipm-data-outcomes. For CCTF body there are "CCTF Recommendation 1970-02" and "CCTF Meetings 5" document.

@andrew2net CCDS is the same as CCTF. It's just an old body name that was used before CCTF. So this identifier: "CCDS Recommendation 1970-02", should be equivalent to "CCTF Recommendation 1970-02".

manuelfuenmayor commented 2 years ago

For more information, please check point 2 from this thread: https://github.com/metanorma/metanorma-bipm/issues/164

andrew2net commented 2 years ago

@manuel489 can we close this issue?

manuelfuenmayor commented 2 years ago

@andrew2net I've confirmed that identiers with CCTF body name fetch properly. However, as far as I understand, we also need to support CCDS body name. It just would be to make CCDS=CCTF.

And one last question, what would be the proper identifier to fetch from this file: https://github.com/metanorma/bipm-data-outcomes/blob/main/cipm/meetings-en/meeting-50.yml (Note that this is a Meeting, not a specific resolution.)

andrew2net commented 2 years ago

And one last question, what would be the proper identifier to fetch from this file: https://github.com/metanorma/bipm-data-outcomes/blob/main/cipm/meetings-en/meeting-50.yml (Note that this is a Meeting, not a specific resolution.)

@manuel489 CIPM Meetings 50

manuelfuenmayor commented 2 years ago

Confirmed, thanks!