relaton / relaton-ietf

RFCBib: retrieve RFC Standards for bibliographic use using the BibliographicItem model
BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License
2 stars 0 forks source link

Datatracker does not provide all Internet-Drafts yet due to incomplete information, on hold for official fix #78

Open ronaldtse opened 2 years ago

ronaldtse commented 2 years ago

https://github.com/ietf-ribose/relaton-data-ids/issues/11

For example, we don’t have this one: http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.draft-abarth-cookie-02.xml

There’s nothing here: https://github.com/ietf-ribose/relaton-data-ids/blob/main/data/draft-abarth-cookie-02.yaml

It clearly exists on xml2rfc server.

@andrew2net you need to check:

  1. Does this Internet-Draft exist in the rsync location?
    • rsync -avcizxL rsync.ietf.org::bibxml-ids ./bibxml-ids
  2. If so, why does Relaton-IETF not import this file?
andrew2net commented 2 years ago
  1. Does this Internet-Draft exist in the rsync location?

@ronaldtse it doesn't exist

$ ls bibxml-ids/reference.I-D.draft-abarth-cookie-*     
bibxml-ids/reference.I-D.draft-abarth-cookie-07.xml
ronaldtse commented 2 years ago

@andrew2net you're right, I only see:

$ cd bibxml-ids
$ ll | grep abarth
reference.I-D.draft-abarth-cake-01.xml
reference.I-D.draft-abarth-cookie-07.xml
reference.I-D.draft-abarth-mime-sniff-06.xml
reference.I-D.draft-abarth-origin-09.xml
reference.I-D.draft-abarth-principles-of-origin-00.xml
reference.I-D.draft-abarth-thewebsocketprotocol-01.xml
reference.I-D.draft-abarth-url-01.xml
reference.I-D.draft-abarth-websocket-handshake-01.xml

We need to ping @rjsparks.

UPDATE: filed issue at https://github.com/ietf-ribose/relaton-data-ids/issues/11

rjsparks commented 2 years ago

As noted on the other ticket - this is because the datatracker has incomplete information for that draft, and this will be repaired at some point in the future. It is ok that the service doesn't serve this bibxml even if the older service did.

ronaldtse commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the clarification @rjsparks ! I will keep this issue open for future tracking.