search

relaton / relaton-iso

RelatonIso: ISO Standards metadata using the BibliographicItem model
BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License
2 stars 1 forks source link

Referencing staged ISO references with dates #120

Open ronaldtse opened 2 years ago

ronaldtse commented 2 years ago

This error shows up in https://github.com/metanorma/SWF-Corpus_and_IEEEP2874-D2/

Style: (XML Line 000001): Normative reference iso-iec-ieee_42010 is not dated.

However, the encoding of the reference already includes a stage, which provides sufficient identification:

* [[[iso-iec-ieee_42010,ISO/IEC/IEEE FDIS 42010]]], Software, systems and enterprise — Architecture description.

Technically, it is an undated identifier, but Metanorma/Relaton does not accept a date for a staged reference. Each stage however is linked to a particular date.

https://www.iso.org/standard/74393.html

For this document, I should be able to cite as multiple stages:

Screenshot 2022-07-02 at 11 54 51 AM Screenshot 2022-07-02 at 11 54 41 AM

FDIS stage

Screenshot 2022-07-02 at 11 54 23 AM

Only 2022 is the correct date because 50.xx starts in 2022.

DIS stage

Screenshot 2022-07-02 at 11 54 11 AM

2021 and 2020 both work because 40.xx is between 2020 and 2021.

CD stage

Screenshot 2022-07-02 at 11 50 42 AM

30.xx is 2020 or before only.

WD stage

Unsure if there is a WD stage document because there is no WD draft officially registered for this document, but could exist.

Stage 10.99 (AWI)

Screenshot 2022-07-02 at 11 53 18 AM

10.99 is 2018 only.

NP stage

An NP stage document could exist but the NP stage is never officially registered.

andrew2net commented 2 years ago

@ronaldtse does https://www.iso.org/standard/85335.html has WD stage?

image
andrew2net commented 2 years ago

@ronaldtse do we need to cite same document with different references?

ronaldtse commented 2 years ago

@andrew2net great find!

There have been two changes at ISO.

———— There is a new thing called the “WD Study” stage.

Last November, ISO have launched a new type of WG consultation called the ‘Working Draft (WD) study’. The ‘Working Draft (WD) study’ is common practice during the ‘Preparatory stage’ of a project and aimed at gathering comments from WG members on the draft (stage 20.20 and 20.60 in the International harmonized stage codes).

For a project, a WD study should be done at least one time or several times, and WD draft can be drafted and discussed in WG firstly. Once the project team has collaboratively worked to establish a mature draft, the WG convener should launch the ‘Working Draft (WD) study’ to gather WG members for comments.

A recommended time to launch a WD study can be the 1/2 to 2/3 time period from NP ballot approved to CD draft submission.

————

So yes, a draft at this stage is considered a WD.

ronaldtse commented 2 years ago

In the WD stage the document is still WD.