Retrieving bibliographic relations

[ronaldtse]

Each document contains relationships:

ISO 8601-1:2019 (https://www.iso.org/standard/70907.html)

The date of superseding can be found in the bibliographic date:

Obsoleted documents like ISO 8601:2004 (https://www.iso.org/standard/40874.html) have a section:

And this information for the date and relations:

[andrew2net]

The date of superseding can be found in the bibliographic date:

Isn't the date of stage's changes?

[andrew2net]

Obsoleted documents like ISO 8601:2004 (https://www.iso.org/standard/40874.html) have a section:

There isn't the section anymore.

[ronaldtse]

They just moved it to the top:

[andrew2net]

They just moved it to the top:

Anyway, it's the same information as in the REVISIONS / CORRIGENDA section. We already use it.

[ronaldtse]

@andrew2net that's great then, do we now parse all of the dates to stages properly?

[andrew2net]

@ronaldtse we don't have a date in the status element

status =
  element status {
     ( stage, substage?, iteration? )
}

stage = element stage { text }
substage = element substage { txt }
iteration = element iteration { text }

[ronaldtse]

I think each document stage will use a separate bibitem. For example, if we have ISO 9001, we can find out the date of ISO/DIS 9001 from the same page.

[andrew2net]

Ok, as soon as the changes will be implemented in grammar I'll use it to store stage date, but now it will be lost when we save a document in an XML file.

[opoudjis]

Wait, I just saw this randomly in my periodic review of notifications, and I think you're talking at cross purposes.

@andrew2net, you're assuming that there will be an optional date stored in the status for each distinct status assigned to a document.

@ronaldtse and I have assumed that, if you are tracking dates or other metadata for each status: the bibitems are related as instances/versions of the same underlying document. Since there will be one status per bibitem, the date of the status assignment will be the /date[@type = 'circulated'] for that bibitem: the date of that bibitem is after all going to be the date specific to that status. So there is no need to embed the date within the status.