relaton / relaton-iso

RelatonIso: ISO Standards metadata using the BibliographicItem model
BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License
2 stars 1 forks source link

Incorrect abbreviation of ISO #90

Closed opoudjis closed 4 years ago

opoudjis commented 4 years ago

For the record retrieved for ISO 19103:2005, which turns out to be ISO/TS 19103:2005, "ISO/TS" is incorrectly being given as the organisation name. "TS" stands for "technical specification", and is not part of the abbreviation of ISO! In fact, nothing after the "/" in a document identifier is; they are either document types (ISO/TS), document stages (ISO/CD), or distinct organisations (e.g. ISO/IEC).

This is causing incorrect output in https://github.com/metanorma/metanorma-ogc/issues/144

andrew2net commented 4 years ago

@ronaldtse do we have a list of publisher organizations? ISO, IEC, IEEE. Anything else?

ronaldtse commented 4 years ago

I don't have a full list, but ISO documents can be published by:

ISO IEC ISO/IEC ISO/IEEE (https://www.iso.org/standard/61897.html) ISO/IEC/IEEE (https://www.iso.org/standard/63712.html) ISO/SAE (https://www.iso.org/standard/70918.html) ISO/CIE (https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#!iso:std:67002:en) ISO/ASME (https://www.iso.org/standard/71534.html)

ronaldtse commented 4 years ago

When we parse the document identifier, after the "/" first parse:

If the first part is the stage, then the second part could be the document type e.g. "ISO/CD TS 12345".

andrew2net commented 4 years ago

ISO/CIW (https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#!iso:std:67002:en)

@ronaldtse do you mean ISO/CIE?

ronaldtse commented 4 years ago

Yes, fixed.