Closed christianvoigt closed 6 months ago
Hi!
Duplicate of micromark/micromark-extension-directive#22
Hi! This was closed. Team: If this was fixed, please add phase/solved
. Otherwise, please add one of the no/*
labels.
Hi! Thanks for taking the time to contribute!
Because we treat issues as our backlog, we close duplicates to focus our work and not have to touch the same chunk of code for the same reason multiple times. This is also why we may mark something as duplicate that isn’t an exact duplicate but is closely related.
Thanks, — bb
Hi team! It seems this post is a duplicate, but hasn’t been marked as such. Please post a comment w/ Duplicate of #123
(no final .
) to do so. See GH docs for more info.
Thanks, — bb
Initial checklist
Affected packages and versions
remark-directive 3.0.0
Link to runnable example
example
Steps to reproduce
I am using remark-directives to mark up deleted and inserted text ranges within paragraphs (similar to critic markup). I use
:del[old text ]
and:ins[new text ]
for this.Currently, remark-directive does not respect empty spaces around the text. I saw https://github.com/remarkjs/remark-directive/issues/1 but think my case is slightly different as I use normal Markdown inside of the directive that should not be affected by putting it inside a directive. I don't see code fences as a viable workaround in this case.
Expected behavior
The trailing whitespace should be preserved.
Actual behavior
The trailing whitespace is removed.
Runtime
Node v17
Package manager
npm 8
OS
macOS
Build and bundle tools
Webpack