Closed radarfox closed 1 year ago
Yes, definitely. Would you like to create a PR?
Hi! This was marked as ready to be worked on! Note that while this is ready to be worked on, nothing is said about priority: it may take a while for this to be solved.
Is this something you can and want to work on?
Team: please use the area/*
(to describe the scope of the change), platform/*
(if this is related to a specific one), and semver/*
and type/*
labels to annotate this. If this is first-timers friendly, add good first issue
and if this could use help, add help wanted
.
Hi!
Everything will be updated. Updating everything takes months. It’s not beneficial to have some issues about some updates open, so I’ll close this. I’ll get to it!
Hi! This was closed. Team: If this was fixed, please add phase/solved
. Otherwise, please add one of the no/*
labels.
This issue is more about aligning the katex
and @types/katex
dependencies than making sure they are up-to-date. However, knowing that everything in the unified is in the progress of being updated, I agree.
Initial checklist
Problem
Please, update
@types/katex
dependency to v0.16 to match the dependencykatex@^0.16.0
that is used inrehype-katex
. Otherwise, two@types/katex
dependencies will be installed in my project. The other coming frommicromark-extension-math@2.1.2
(the latest version3.0.0
also uses types v0.16).Solution
npm update @types/katex@^0.16.0
Alternatives
None