remindmodel / remind

REMIND - REgional Model of INvestments and Development
Other
91 stars 121 forks source link

q37_FossilFeedstock_Base still relevant? #1606

Open 0UmfHxcvx5J7JoaOhFSs5mncnisTJJ6q opened 3 months ago

0UmfHxcvx5J7JoaOhFSs5mncnisTJJ6q commented 3 months ago

https://github.com/remindmodel/remind/blob/25fb451b542efce1c817554e2f796d702eb3b3f1/modules/37_industry/subsectors/equations.gms#L324-L334

that was set up by @fschreyer to prevent the model from using biomass or synfuels in baseline runs. However, I think that now that might be unnecessary because we improved emissions accounting (including incineration) and we are not supposed to use baseline anymore...

https://github.com/remindmodel/remind/pull/1599#issuecomment-1980448924

Does this still have some relevance? If so, we need to add further restrictions.

fschreyer commented 3 months ago

How do Npi feedstock sources look now? Are they all going non-fossil?

0UmfHxcvx5J7JoaOhFSs5mncnisTJJ6q commented 3 months ago

Fossil/biomass/synfuels mix for feedstocks is identical to that of the chemicals subsector overall.

fschreyer commented 3 months ago

Ah ok, good! And that is not going crazy compared to results before the feedstocks implementation in terms of a shift to non-fossil sources, right? I guess, the equation can then simply be removed without any need for further action.

0UmfHxcvx5J7JoaOhFSs5mncnisTJJ6q commented 3 months ago

SSP2EU-NPi-AMT from 2023-12-08 and 2024-03-01 image

fschreyer commented 3 months ago

I meant the distribution of fossil, biogenic, synthetic sources non-energy FE. So this one, for example from /p/projects/remind/runs/REMIND_2024_02_16/remind/compScen-SSP2EU-2024-02-19_18.54.49-H12.pdf :

Looks all pretty fossil, which at least for the Npi scenario makes sense. There is a weird synfuel spike in 2100 for Npi but that's a known issue for all of REMIND and I am working on an update which will fix this.

In summary, the equation is not needed anymore.

image

0UmfHxcvx5J7JoaOhFSs5mncnisTJJ6q commented 3 months ago

Well, there is no plot for feedstocks composition before the feedstocks implementation. Your plot on the other hand is before the fix, so the data is rather meaningless. And last REMIND version having both Base and NPi succeed is from before the fix

$ ls -t /p/projects/remind/modeltests/remind/output/SSP2EU-*-AMT_2024*/REMIND_generic*withoutPlus.mif | grep -E 'SSP2EU-(NPi|Base)-AMT' | xargs -n 1 dirname | xargs -n 1 basename
SSP2EU-Base-AMT_2024-03-08_22.07.51
SSP2EU-NPi-AMT_2024-02-16_22.09.22
SSP2EU-NPi-AMT_2024-03-01_22.11.59
SSP2EU-Base-AMT_2024-02-23_22.08.58
SSP2EU-NPi-AMT_2024-02-23_22.09.17

so we are left guessing.

fschreyer commented 3 months ago

Your plot on the other hand is before the fix, so the data is rather meaningless.

Well, the probability that all of industry goes fossil in Npi when before the constraint both industry and non-energy use went fossil is quite high I'd say. But we will see.