Open 0UmfHxcvx5J7JoaOhFSs5mncnisTJJ6q opened 3 months ago
How do Npi feedstock sources look now? Are they all going non-fossil?
Fossil/biomass/synfuels mix for feedstocks is identical to that of the chemicals subsector overall.
Ah ok, good! And that is not going crazy compared to results before the feedstocks implementation in terms of a shift to non-fossil sources, right? I guess, the equation can then simply be removed without any need for further action.
SSP2EU-NPi-AMT from 2023-12-08 and 2024-03-01
I meant the distribution of fossil, biogenic, synthetic sources non-energy FE. So this one, for example from /p/projects/remind/runs/REMIND_2024_02_16/remind/compScen-SSP2EU-2024-02-19_18.54.49-H12.pdf
:
Looks all pretty fossil, which at least for the Npi scenario makes sense. There is a weird synfuel spike in 2100 for Npi but that's a known issue for all of REMIND and I am working on an update which will fix this.
In summary, the equation is not needed anymore.
Well, there is no plot for feedstocks composition before the feedstocks implementation. Your plot on the other hand is before the fix, so the data is rather meaningless. And last REMIND version having both Base and NPi succeed is from before the fix
$ ls -t /p/projects/remind/modeltests/remind/output/SSP2EU-*-AMT_2024*/REMIND_generic*withoutPlus.mif | grep -E 'SSP2EU-(NPi|Base)-AMT' | xargs -n 1 dirname | xargs -n 1 basename
SSP2EU-Base-AMT_2024-03-08_22.07.51
SSP2EU-NPi-AMT_2024-02-16_22.09.22
SSP2EU-NPi-AMT_2024-03-01_22.11.59
SSP2EU-Base-AMT_2024-02-23_22.08.58
SSP2EU-NPi-AMT_2024-02-23_22.09.17
so we are left guessing.
Your plot on the other hand is before the fix, so the data is rather meaningless.
Well, the probability that all of industry goes fossil in Npi when before the constraint both industry and non-energy use went fossil is quite high I'd say. But we will see.
https://github.com/remindmodel/remind/blob/25fb451b542efce1c817554e2f796d702eb3b3f1/modules/37_industry/subsectors/equations.gms#L324-L334
https://github.com/remindmodel/remind/pull/1599#issuecomment-1980448924
Does this still have some relevance? If so, we need to add further restrictions.