Make process-based steel default; update macro parameters

[JakobBD]

Purpose of this PR

• Make process-based steel (cm_subsec_model = processes) the default option.
• Change calibration file naming convention such that the default file name now refers to process-based steel (ces-based steel gets a file name extension)
• New macro-economic parameters by @mleimbach
• Minor developments on the process-based steel model (carbon capture tech now captures the co2 emitted from its own heating gas consumption)

Type of change

(Make sure to delete from the Type-of-change list the items not relevant to your PR)

• [ ] Bug fix
• [ ] Refactoring
• [x] New feature
• [ ] Minor change (default scenarios show only small differences)
• [x] Fundamental change
• [ ] This change requires a documentation update

Checklist:

• [x] My code follows the coding etiquette
• [x] I performed a self-review of my own code
• [x] I explained my changes within the PR, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• [x] I checked that the in-code documentation is up-to-date
• [x] I adjusted the reporting in remind2 where it was needed
• [x] I adjusted forbiddenColumnNames in readCheckScenarioConfig.R in case the PR leads to deprecated switches
• [x] All automated model tests pass (FAIL 0 in the output of make test)
• [x] The changelog CHANGELOG.md has been updated correctly

Further information (optional):

• Test runs are here:

/p/tmp/jakobdu/remind_pbs/output/

• Comparison of results (what changes by this PR?):

[LaviniaBaumstark]

I think it would be generally beneficial to separate out different changes into different pull requests, instead of lumping them together. In this case:

* setting new prtp/ies parameters

* removing explicit SE tracking for industry FE

* making PBS the default

From the PR title, nobody will guess all this is going on here. Also, all three of these ought to be mentioned in the changelog.

In general, I agree that the best way would be to have only one topic in each PR. But here removing explicit SE tracking for industry FEand making PBS the defaultare to closely related that they should be merged in one PR. In addition, setting new prtp/ies parameterswould also require a recalibration merging it to one PR reduces the number of recalibrations and avoids having REMIND with no correlated CES parameters available.

[JakobBD]

I agree that Marian's changes should have been a different PR.

removing explicit SE tracking for industry FE

was a different PR #1659

Changelog will still be updated, that's why the box is still un-ticked. Fair point though, it wasn't clear from the PR that this is still planned.

[JakobBD]

Compare Scenarios:

Full PDFs are in cloud folder, link was posted in mattermost REMIND channel.

NPI

Pk Budget 650

[0UmfHxcvx5J7JoaOhFSs5mncnisTJJ6q]

removing explicit SE tracking for industry FE

was a different PR #1659

Indeed it was. I should look more closely at changed equations.

[JakobBD]

While I still believe some vetting of AMT CS2 results prior to merge would be better/safer, the PR is now ready for merge, as far as I can see. Calibration files in the public repo are already updated, and the new hash has been added to this PR.