Closed JakobBD closed 4 months ago
I tested this too, same result (unsurprisingly).
Weird to see these differences between AMT and stock develop
runs, though.
I do not see any point in adjusting CES elasticities over this.
Doing final tests on this after separating the fixed_shares refactoring (same directory as above, newest two runs). From my side ready to merge once these tests have passed.
Tests came back fine, ready to merge from my point of view.
Purpose of this PR
So far, cement process emissions were fixed to a value based on the previous iteration's
ue_cement
.ue_cement
therefore only saw energy-related emissions as an incentive for reduction.This PR makes cement process emissions a function of ue_cement in the current iteration, such that CONOPT sees the incentive to reduce ue_cement.
I still have to check and clean up the fixing of
vm_macBase
andvm_emiIndBase
incore/presolve.gms
, as process cement CCS cost enters the budget equation twice right now.TBD if we like the results, and if we want to do some ad-hoc adaptation, e.g. to CES elasticities.
Type of change
(Make sure to delete from the Type-of-change list the items not relevant to your PR)
Checklist:
remind2
where it was neededforbiddenColumnNames
in readCheckScenarioConfig.R in case the PR leads to deprecated switchesFAIL 0
in the output ofmake test
)CHANGELOG.md
has been updated correctlyFurther information (optional):
/p/tmp/jakobdu/remind_temp2