Open cp526 opened 2 months ago
Also related: #498, #471, #361, #357, #320, #311, #256
It sounds like this involves renaming "extract" to "focus" and adding a deprecation warning on "extract". Does that seem accurate @cp526? If so, maybe this is a good next issue for me to work on.
In the spirit of getting as much "naming tidying" done as possible while some of our attention is focused there, I'd say yes...
Message ID: @.***>
Sounds good. If @cp526 is on board, I can look at that after adding benchmarking to CI.
Sounds good to me!
as suggested by Benjamin ( https://github.com/rems-project/cn-tutorial/issues/51 ). The current name "extract" does not reflect the semantics of the CN statement very well.