Open cherfychow opened 3 weeks ago
Hi Cher,
That should not happen and I never saw it or heard from anybody that got the same. Something seems off with with the prediction because your lower and upper quantiles are exactly the same (unless you specified only 1 iteration).
Can you share data and code to reproduce this?
Yeah no problem. Thanks for getting back so quickly. Here's the code and data: negKmax_forRenato.zip
Thanks for such a great package, Renato! I have been using the package to calculate fish growth on my data of 579 species in 500 iterations. For 97 length records of 13 species, the modelling's estimated Kmax ≤ 0. For some species, all Kmax estimates are negative, while for others, it's only for certain lengths/SSTs. They're mostly benthic reef-dwellers, but not all benthic reef-dwellers had this issue. I've double checked the traits and input parameters and they all seem realistic and reasonable and well below MaxSize. Should this be possible with the boosted regression trees? Hoping it's user error on my part!
Here is a summary of the records with Kmax ≤ 0.