Closed jhclark closed 9 years ago
Thanks for the hint. Your are completly right. With the next release on the master branch we will update a license.txt it will most likely be GPL
Any definity decision on License? I would vote for GPL3.
same for me. bsd / apache might also be an option. but I like GPLv3
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Lukas Schmelzeisen <notifications@github.com
wrote:
Any definity decision on License? I would vote for GPL3.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/renepickhardt/generalized-language-modeling-toolkit/issues/63#issuecomment-68871697 .
www.rene-pickhardt.de http://www.beijing-china-blog.com/
Skype: rene.pickhardt
mobile: +49 (0)157 / 3730 2422 office: +49 (0) 261 / 287 2765 fax: +49 (0) 267 / 287 100 2765
china mobile: +86 186 2129 5033
To conform to GPL we need a line of the form:
Copyright (C) <year> <name of author>
I do not feel comfortable naming either you or me as author here, so what do we write. University of Koblenz-Landau? Year should be 2012-2015 right?
GLMTK is now licensed under GPLv3.
Could you stick a License.txt under the root?
I personally like BSD, but this is of course a personal choice for each coder. :)